Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hydroxyapatite: catalyst or conjuror?

Vijay J Rasquinha1, Chitranjan S Ranawat, Anthony J Mauriello

  • 1Ranawat Orthopaedic Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York 10021, USA.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|June 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variability in Acetabular Component Position in Patients Undergoing Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Who Have Concomitant Spine Pathology.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2021
Same author

Clinical Outcomes of a Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Prosthesis Compared to Its Predecessor at 5-Year Follow-Up: Matched Pair Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2020
Same author

The Effect of Bladder Catheterization on Ambulation and Venous Thromboembolism Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Institutional Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2020
Same author

Does Intermittent Catheterization Compared to Indwelling Catheterization Decrease the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The Journal of arthroplasty·2020
Same author

The Effect of Bladder Catheterization Technique on Postoperative Urinary Tract Infections After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2020
Same author

The Cumulative Effect of Substance Abuse Disorders and Depression on Postoperative Complications After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2020
Same journal

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Prior Internal Fixation: A Comparison with Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

The Relationship Between Patient Satisfaction and the Degree of Valgus Deformity in Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Mean 3-Year Follow-Up.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Kneeling After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Resurfacing the Patella Affect the Ability to Kneel?

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Integrating Robotic-Assisted Arthroplasty into Orthopaedic Education: The Fellows' Perspective.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

A Systematic Review of Registry and Large Database Studies Comparing Contemporary Cementless and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Impact of Combined Immersive Virtual Reality and Spinal Anesthesia on Sedative Consumption in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
See all related articles

Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated hip implants promote faster recovery and reduce pain compared to non-coated implants. This study found HA coating leads to superior osseointegration and improved patient function.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Hip replacement surgery aims to restore function and reduce pain.
  • The use of surface coatings on implants is a key area of research.
  • Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a bioceramic material known for its osteoconductive properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of proximally hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated hip implants versus non-HA-coated implants.
  • To evaluate the effect of HA coating on implant osseointegration, patient function, and pain.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, randomized study involving 174 patients (199 hips).
  • Comparison of identical stem designs with and without proximal HA coating.
  • Clinical assessment using the Hospital for Special Surgery modification of the Postel--d'Aubigne Hip Rating System.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Radiographic evaluation to assess bone ongrowth and implant stability.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant radiographic differences were observed between HA-coated and non-HA-coated stems; all showed bone ongrowth.
    • Patients with HA-coated stems reported significantly less activity-related thigh pain (P=.03).
    • HA-coated stems demonstrated earlier recovery of function and reduced activity-related trochanteric and thigh pain.

    Conclusions:

    • Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating on hip implants leads to improved early functional recovery and reduced pain.
    • Superior early osseointegration is a likely mechanism for the observed benefits of HA coating.
    • HA coating shows promise as a biologic adjuvant for enhancing hip implant performance and patient outcomes.