Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolution and physics in comparative protein structure modeling.

András Fiser1, Michael Feig, Charles L Brooks

  • 1Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Pels Family Center for Biochemistry and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021, USA.

Accounts of Chemical Research
|June 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

XL-MS-Guided Structure Prediction of Disordered <i>Encephalitozoon hellem</i> Proteins.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Extending structural surfaceomics to identify aberrant conformations of tumor surface proteins as potential immunotherapy targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Conservation of Human IgSF Proteins Throughout Eukaryotic Evolution.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Systematic discovery of pro- and anti-HIV host factors in primary human CD4+ T cells.

Cell·2026
Same author

The scientific legacy of Martin Karplus from the perspective of his collaborators.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same author

The filamentous ultrastructure of the PopZ condensate is required for its cellular function.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Design Principles for Negative Thermal Expansion in Two-Dimensional Materials.

Accounts of chemical research·2026
Same journal

Main Group Redox Catalysis: New Frontiers with Germanium and Tin.

Accounts of chemical research·2026
Same journal

Taming Irreversibility in sp<sup>2</sup>-Carbon-Conjugated COFs from Polycrystalline Powders to Single Crystals and Thin Films.

Accounts of chemical research·2026
Same journal

Electroactive Imidazolium Ionic Liquids in Organic Synthesis.

Accounts of chemical research·2026
Same journal

Calix[4]resorcinarene-Based Porous Organic Cages: Synthesis and Applications.

Accounts of chemical research·2026
Same journal

Light-Driven Dual Rotary Molecular Motors and Beyond.

Accounts of chemical research·2026
See all related articles

Protein structure prediction uses physical forces and evolution. This review explores comparative modeling, enhancing it with physical insights like solvation effects for accurate protein structure determination.

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Protein native structure arises from physical forces during folding and evolutionary processes.
  • Two main approaches exist for protein structure prediction: de novo prediction and comparative modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review comparative protein structure modeling techniques.
  • To discuss integrating physical principles into protein structure prediction.
  • To highlight the role of solvation effects in loop modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Review of comparative protein structure modeling.
  • Discussion of incorporating physical considerations.
  • Illustrative example using solvation effects in loop modeling.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Comparative modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints offers a robust starting point.
  • Integrating physical factors, such as solvation, improves model accuracy.
  • Solvation effects are crucial for accurate modeling of protein loops.

Conclusions:

  • Comparative modeling is a powerful tool for protein structure prediction.
  • Incorporating physical principles enhances the accuracy and reliability of predicted structures.
  • Further research into physical considerations will advance protein structure prediction.