Related Experiment Videos
Impact of infections on primary care--greater than expected
D M Fleming1, G E Smith, J R H Charlton
1Birmingham Research Unit of the Royal College of General Practitioners, Lordswood House, 54 Lordswood Road, Harborne, Birmingham B17 9DB. dfleming@rcgp-bru.demon.co.uk
Abstract:
Though infection has declined as a cause of death it consumes a major proportion of primary care resources, and because of antibiotic resistance is increasingly important. We examined the burden of illness attributable to infection in primary care by analysing data from the fourth practice-based national morbidity survey which monitored all consultations by diagnosis in 470,000 persons over a 12 month period from September 1991 to August 1992. Rates of persons consulting, new episodes of illness and consultations were calculated according to the list of infections published by Wilson and Bhopal (W&B list), and as amended by the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC list); selected comparisons were made with national data on hospital derived finished consultant episodes and deaths. Forty-one percent of all registered persons consulted on at least one occasion during the year for infection (estimated by either list). Infections accounted for 40% of all new episodes of illness and 29% of all consultations; respiratory infections accounted for approximately half the infection total. New episode rates were highest in children aged less than 1 year and lowest in males 25-54 years and females 55-64 years. Except in infancy, rates were higher in females. There were 734 episodes of infection annually per 1,000 population reported in general practice compared with 20 per 1,000 finished consultant episodes. The average episode of infection prompted 1.2 general practice consultations. Improved management through more precise diagnosis by near patient tests is desirable, but is unlikely to be obtained cost effectively if consultation numbers or the time spent is substantially increased. These results emphasise the importance of adequate training for general practitioners in the natural history, epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment (pharmacology) of infection.
Insights
Infections significantly burden primary care, accounting for 40% of new illnesses and 29% of consultations. Respiratory infections are most common, with rates highest in infants and females. This highlights the need for better general practitioner training in infection management.
Area of Science:
- Primary care research
- Infectious disease epidemiology
- General practice
Background:
- Infection remains a significant drain on primary care resources, despite declining mortality rates.
- The rise of antibiotic resistance makes understanding infection burden crucial.
- Previous studies lacked comprehensive data on infection prevalence in primary care settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the burden of illness attributable to infection in primary care.
- To analyze consultation rates, new illness episodes, and demographic variations for infections.
- To compare primary care infection data with hospital and mortality data.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the fourth national morbidity survey (1991-1992).
- Inclusion of 470,000 individuals over a 12-month period, monitoring all consultations by diagnosis.
- Utilized Wilson and Bhopal (W&B) list and Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC) list for infection classification.
Main Results:
- 41% of individuals consulted for infection annually.
- Infections constituted 40% of new illnesses and 29% of all consultations; respiratory infections comprised half of all infections.
- New episode rates were highest in infants (<1 year) and higher in females, except in infancy. General practice reported 734 infection episodes per 1,000 population annually.
Conclusions:
- Infections represent a substantial workload in primary care, necessitating efficient management strategies.
- Improved diagnostic tools are desirable but must be cost-effective without increasing consultation time.
- Enhanced training for general practitioners in infection natural history, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment is essential.