Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing clinical risk assessments using operationalized criteria.

C S H Brown¹, K R Lloyd

¹Department of Mental Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum

|June 20, 2002

Summary

Psychiatrists

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Prevalence, characteristics and comorbidities of anxiety disorders in France: results from the "Mental Health in General Population" survey (MHGP).

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2010

Same author

A national survey of violence experienced by community mental health researchers.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2001

Same author

Trends in admissions to a regional secure unit (1983-1997).

Medicine, science, and the law·2001

Same author

The development of the Short Explanatory Model Interview (SEMI) and its use among primary-care attenders with common mental disorders.

Psychological medicine·1998

Same author

Common mental disorders, explanatory models and consultation behaviour among Indian women living in the UK.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·1998

Same author

Long-term outcome of patients with neurotic illness in general practice.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1996

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychiatry
Clinical Psychology
Mental Health Services Research

Background:

Clinical risk assessment for harm to others is crucial in psychiatric settings.
Variability in risk assessment exists across different security levels of mental health services.
Standardized tools may improve consistency in risk evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare clinical risk assessments performed by psychiatrists across low, medium, and high security mental health settings.
To evaluate the effectiveness of an operationalized risk assessment tool (OP-RISK) in improving inter-rater reliability.

Main Methods:

Development of a checklist with explicit criteria for clinical risk factors (OP-RISK).
Prospective cohort study of 161 consecutive referrals to a high secure psychiatric hospital.
Comparison of risk assessments using unstructured methods versus the OP-RISK checklist.

Main Results:

Poor agreement (kappa=-0.006) was observed between psychiatrists using unstructured risk assessments.
Application of the OP-RISK checklist significantly improved agreement (kappa=0.742).
The operationalized criteria enhanced consistency in risk assessment across different service settings.

Conclusions:

Operationalized criteria, such as OP-RISK, enhance the integration of risk assessment across diverse mental health service settings.
The OP-RISK tool shows potential to streamline the referral process to tertiary psychiatric care.
Standardized risk assessment improves reliability and facilitates communication between different levels of mental health care.

Related Experiment Videos