Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Toward a universal standard: comparing two methods for standardizing spotted microarray data.

Michael Ryan Weil1, Timothy Macatee, Harold R Garner

  • 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

Biotechniques
|June 21, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Process Evaluation of a Mobile App for Medical Students Aimed at Increasing Resilience and Decreasing Stigma in Mental Health.

Cureus·2024
Same author

Common outpatient diagnoses and associated treatments logged by osteopathic medical students within a geriatric population.

Journal of osteopathic medicine·2024
Same author

A Comprehensive Investigation of Active Learning Strategies for Conducting Anti-Cancer Drug Screening.

Cancers·2024
Same author

Tracing the Genetic Evolution of Canine Parvovirus Type 2 (CPV-2) in Thailand.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

<i>Usp22</i> Overexpression Leads to Aberrant Signal Transduction of Cancer-Related Pathways but Is Not Sufficient to Drive Tumor Formation in Mice.

Cancers·2021
Same author

Evaluating disease outbreaks with syndromic surveillance using medical student clinical rotation patient encounter logs.

Journal of osteopathic medicine·2021
Same journal

Investigating the interactomic landscape of survival motor neuron (SMN) and the SMNΔ7 truncated protein.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Antigen retrieval-immunofluorescence on free floating sections to visualize the liver lobule and its cellular makeup.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Special approach of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for transgene stability of a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Strand-specific quantification of L1 ORF0 and related transcripts by multiplex reverse transcription with tagged primers.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Why and when should we choose digital PCR?

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Quantitative and unbiased lung alveolar septum assessment in an LPS experimental mouse model using 2D-spatial correlation image analysis from hematoxylin and eosin slides.

BioTechniques·2026
See all related articles

Comparing universal standards for DNA microarrays, this study found that both genomic DNA and total RNA pools yield statistically identical results. This standardization is crucial for comparable transcriptome studies across laboratories.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • DNA microarray technology enables deep transcriptome analysis.
  • Lack of universal standards previously hindered inter-laboratory comparability of microarray results.
  • Two universal standardization methods have emerged: genomic DNA and total RNA pools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of two universal standardization methods for human DNA microarrays.
  • To assess the comparability of results obtained using genomic DNA versus a total RNA pool as standards.

Main Methods:

  • Hybridization of labeled analytes to human cDNA arrays (4000- or 10800-member).
  • Analyte preparation: 2 µg normal human genomic DNA (nick translation) or 20 µg total RNA pool (reverse transcription).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical comparison using McNemar test with Yate's correction.

    • Main Results:

    • Both genomic DNA and total RNA pool methods were applied to human cDNA arrays.
    • Background-subtracted data analysis showed comparable numbers of spots above the threshold for both methods.
    • Statistical analysis (McNemar test, chi2 = 3.72) indicated no significant difference between the two standardization methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Genomic DNA and total RNA pools serve as statistically equivalent universal standards for human DNA microarray analysis.
    • This standardization facilitates direct comparison of transcriptome data across different experiments and laboratories.
    • The findings support the adoption of these universal standards for robust and reproducible microarray studies.