Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Error rates in dental microwear quantification using scanning electron microscopy.

F E Grine1, P S Ungar, M F Teaford

  • 1Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794-4364, USA. fgrine@notes.cc.sunysb.edu

Scanning
|June 21, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cochlear shape distinguishes southern African early hominin taxa with unique auditory ecologies.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Three-Dimensional Surface Texture Characterization of In Situ Simulated Erosive Tooth Wear.

Journal of dental research·2021
Same author

Inference of Diets of Early Hominins from Primate Molar Form and Microwear.

Journal of dental research·2019
Same author

ANTHROPOLOGY. The evolutionary path of least resistance.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2016
Same author

Worldwide variation in hip fracture incidence weakly aligns with genetic divergence between populations.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2016
Same author

Dental Surface Texture Characterization Based on Erosive Tooth Wear Processes.

Journal of dental research·2016
Same journal

Retracted: Diagnostic Efficacy of CT Radiomic Features in Pulmonary Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: 3D Convolutional Neural Network Framework with Deep Learning for Nuclear Medicine.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: Observation on the Effect of MRI Image Scanning on Knee Pain in Football Injury.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: Optimal Cellular Microscopic Pattern Recognizer- (OCMPR-) Based Wireless Detection Network for Efficiently Leveraging the Parallel Distributed Processing Capabilities.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: Changes of Volume Parameters in the Treatment of Graves Ophthalmopathy by Endoscopic Transethmoidal Decompression of the Orbital Inner Wall Combined with Fat Decompression.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: Diagnostic Value of Specialist Systems in Sports Knee Injuries.

Scanning·2023
See all related articles

Researchers assessed dental microwear analysis error rates. While Microware 4.0 showed low observer error (7-9%), different quantification techniques had high error (19%), impacting prehistoric diet studies.

Area of Science:

  • Primate paleontology
  • Bioarchaeology
  • Dental anthropology

Background:

  • Dental microwear analysis correlates primate diet with tooth surface patterns.
  • Inferences about prehistoric diets rely on microwear data.
  • Previous studies lacked standardized error assessment for microwear quantification techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify intra- and interobserver error rates in dental microwear analysis using Microware 4.0.
  • To evaluate the comparability of different microwear quantification techniques.
  • To establish a baseline for error margins in primate dietary reconstructions.

Main Methods:

  • Dental microwear analysis was performed using Microware 4.0 software.
  • Intraobserver and interobserver error rates were calculated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three widely used quantitative techniques were compared for intertechnique comparability.

    • Main Results:

    • Overall intraobserver error was approximately 7%, and interobserver error was approximately 9%.
    • Microware 4.0 demonstrated consistent results between observers.
    • Significant differences were found between quantification techniques, with an intertechnique error rate of approximately 19%.

    Conclusions:

    • Dental microwear quantification is valuable for broad dietary distinctions but requires consideration of observer and technique error.
    • Standardizing methods, such as adopting Microware 4.0, is crucial for creating a common, reliable microwear database.
    • Future research should account for identified error margins when interpreting population or seasonal dietary differences.