Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perceiving motion while moving: how pairwise nominal invariants make optical flow cohere.

James E Cutting1, Wilson O Readinger

  • 1Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-7601, USA. jec7@cornell.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|June 22, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Observers use visual cues from stationary poles to determine heading. However, a single moving pole can create confusing visual information, making heading detection difficult and less noticeable when motion is similar.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The afterlife of artists.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Large-scale narrative events in popular cinema.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2019
Same author

Sequences in popular cinema generate inconsistent event segmentation.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2019
Same author

Temporal fractals in movies and mind.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2018
Same author

Cryptic Emotions and the Emergence of a Metatheory of Mind in Popular Filmmaking.

Cognitive science·2018
Same author

Considering the filmmaker: Intensified continuity, narrative structure, and the Distancing-Embracing model.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2018

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Navigation
  • Computational neuroscience

Background:

  • Human observers can determine their direction of movement (heading) using visual flow fields.
  • This study investigates how visual invariants derived from multiple objects contribute to heading perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how observers perceive heading using visual invariants from multiple objects.
  • To determine the impact of object motion on the coherence of heading perception.

Main Methods:

  • Computer-generated visual scenes simulated observer movement towards 10 poles (1 moving, 9 stationary).
  • Analysis of visual invariants: convergence, decelerating divergence, and crossover of pole pairs.
  • Observers judged heading direction based on simulated visual flow.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Two-pole invariants (convergence, divergence, crossover) provided specific heading information relative to pole proximity.
  • A coherent heading was perceivable from 45 pairwise movements when all poles were stationary.
  • A single moving pole introduced potential incoherence in heading perception, which was readily detectable.
  • Similar pole motion leading to coherent flow was less detectable than incoherence.

Conclusions:

  • Heading perception relies on specific visual invariants derived from object arrays.
  • The presence of even one moving object can disrupt heading perception, though this disruption is often detectable.
  • The detectability of motion-induced incoherence is higher than that of subtle, coherent motion flows.