Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analyzing developmental sequences within a phylogenetic framework.

Jonathan E Jeffery1, Michael K Richardson, Michael I Coates

  • 1Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, St. George's Hospital Medical School, Tooting, London SW17 ORE, UK.

Systematic Biology
|June 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural tissues and chondrostean traits in a Carboniferous actinopterygian.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Collateral damage from the COVID-19 pandemic: Synergistic toxic effects of rapid antigen tests on the rotifer species Brachionus calyciflorus.

Environmental toxicology and pharmacology·2026
Same author

Teeth outside the jaw: Evolution and development of the toothed head clasper in chimaeras.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Novel assembly of a head-trunk interface in the sister group of jawed vertebrates.

Nature·2025
Same author

The lower jaw of Devonian ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii): Anatomy, relationships, and functional morphology.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2025
Same author

Zebrafish larvae locomotion bioassay: application on nanofractionated <i>Naja nigricollis</i> venom.

Toxicology mechanisms and methods·2025
Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026
See all related articles

Heterochrony, the study of evolutionary developmental timing, is now quantitatively analyzable. A new method, "event-pair cracking," infers key heterochronic shifts within phylogenetic frameworks.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary developmental biology
  • Phylogenetics
  • Developmental timing

Background:

  • Heterochrony is a key evolutionary mechanism, but analyzing developmental timing data phylogenetically is challenging.
  • Sequence heterochrony analysis is hindered by the lack of absolute developmental timeframes for cross-species standardization.
  • Existing methods like "event-pairing" offer relative comparisons but lack quantitative rigor and cannot assess individual event shifts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a quantitative method for analyzing developmental timing data within a phylogenetic framework.
  • To address the limitations of "event-pairing" in assessing evolutionary shifts in heterochrony.
  • To infer key heterochronic shifts using a novel analytical protocol.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Introduced "event-pair cracking," a protocol analyzing event-pair transformations en bloc along phylogenetic branches.
  • Built upon the existing "event-pairing" method for relative developmental event comparisons.
  • Applied the "event-pair cracking" method to a worked example for demonstration.

    • Main Results:

    • Developed a quantitative framework for analyzing heterochrony within phylogenies.
    • Enabled the analysis of event-pair transformations collectively, overcoming limitations of pairwise comparisons.
    • Demonstrated the utility of "event-pair cracking" in inferring significant heterochronic shifts.

    Conclusions:

    • "Event-pair cracking" provides a robust quantitative method for phylogenetic analysis of heterochrony.
    • The method facilitates the inference of key evolutionary shifts in developmental timing.
    • This approach addresses previously identified desiderata for analyzing heterochrony.