Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Regulating the 26S proteasome.

M H Glickman1, V Maytal

  • 1Department of Biology, The Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel.

Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology
|June 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proteasome lid bridges mitochondrial stress with Cdc53/Cullin1 NEDDylation status.

Redox biology·2018
Same author

Challenges of hemodialysis access for high risk patients: Impact of mesenteric vein bioprosthetic graft.

The journal of vascular access·2007
Same author

Keepers at the final gates: regulatory complexes and gating of the proteasome channel.

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS·2004
Same author

Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter?

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2004
Same author

Subunit interaction maps for the regulatory particle of the 26S proteasome and the COP9 signalosome.

The EMBO journal·2001
Same author

Multicenter evaluation of a polyurethaneurea vascular access graft as compared with the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access graft in hemodialysis applications.

Journal of vascular surgery·2001

The eukaryotic proteasome, while having conserved core components, is a dynamic structure. It interacts with various subunits and factors, enabling diverse regulatory roles through increased complexity and signal-dependent alterations.

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • The proteasome's core composition is highly conserved across eukaryotes.
  • Additional proteins associate with proteasomes, suggesting a dynamic structure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the dynamic nature of the proteasome.
  • To understand how proteasome composition is regulated for diverse functions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of proteasome purifications from different species.
  • Review of evidence for transiently associated subunits and cellular factors.
  • Examination of mechanisms for proteasome complexity and regulation.

Main Results:

  • Proteasomes interact with transient subunits and factors for specific functions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mechanisms like gene duplication, regulatory particle addition, and subunit exchange increase proteasome complexity.
  • These adaptations allow for context-dependent fine-tuning of proteasome functions.

    • Conclusions:

    • The proteasome is a dynamic and adaptable molecular machine.
    • Its functional diversity is achieved through compositional plasticity and regulatory interactions.
    • Understanding these dynamics is key to comprehending cellular regulation.