Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

András Hoznek1, David B Samadi, Laurent Salomon

  • 1Service d'Urologie, CHU Henri Mondor, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France. andras.hoznek@hmn.ap-hop-paris.fr.

Current Urology Reports
|June 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CDO1 is a new biomarker to discriminate aggressive forms of prostate cancer.

Oncogene·2026
Same author

Robot-assisted versus open surgery for multiple ipsilateral renal tumors: a multicenter matched cohort study (UroCCR-60).

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Patient-reported outcomes and experiences in outpatient vs inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the BETTY trial.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Results of the Randomized Phase 3 AFU-GETUG-20 Trial Evaluating Adjuvant Leuprorelin Acetate After Radical Prostatectomy in Men with High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer.

European urology oncology·2026
Same author

Digital Systematic Collection of Data for Patient-reported Outcome and Experience Measures Reveals Real-world Recovery Trajectories After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

European urology focus·2025
Same author

Impact of intra-abdominal pressure with AirSeal<sup>®</sup> system on patient-reported outcomes and experience measurements after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

World journal of urology·2025
Same journal

Single Port Robotic Surgery in Benign Urologic Disease - A Review of Contemporary Applications and Outcomes.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Effective Mentorship in Urology Fellowship Training: Qualities, Models, and Equity.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms as an Indicator of Occult Neurologic Disease: A System-first Framework for Urologic Practice.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Association Between Ambient Temperature and Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Is Open Partial Nephrectomy Still an Option in the Robotic Era?

Current urology reports·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offers potential benefits for localized prostate cancer treatment, focusing on reduced operative stress and improved quality of life. Further research is needed to confirm long-term oncologic outcomes compared to open surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is an emerging technique for localized prostate cancer.
  • While oncologic data are still developing, quality-of-life outcomes are a key focus.
  • The technique aims to minimize operative stress and improve postoperative recovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and analyze published outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
  • To compare laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with its open surgical counterparts.
  • To evaluate the functional results and quality-of-life implications of the laparoscopic approach.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of contemporary series on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
  • Analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes reported in published studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of laparoscopic techniques with retropubic and perineal open approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy demonstrates potential for excellent oncologic control, though long-term data are pending.
    • The technique offers enhanced intraoperative visualization for precise dissection of critical structures.
    • Potential improvements in operative stress, postoperative morbidity, and recovery time are suggested.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a viable third option for localized prostate cancer treatment.
    • The approach may offer superior functional outcomes and quality of life.
    • Continued research is essential to validate long-term oncologic efficacy and functional benefits.