Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should laparoscopy be the standard approach used for pelvic lymph node dissection?

J C Kim1, G S Gerber

  • 1Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Current Urology Reports
|June 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPLND) offers a less invasive approach to staging prostate cancer. This technique provides comparable accuracy to open surgery with reduced patient morbidity, making it ideal for high-risk cases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Lymph node mapping-based optimal bowel-resection margin and central radicality in colon cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational cohort study.

ESMO gastrointestinal oncology·2026
Same author

GW250114: Testing Hawking's Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Erratum.

Veterinarni medicina·2025
Same author

Sensitive skin is associated with contact sensitization and decreased nociceptive threshold.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
Same author

Search for Subsolar-Mass Binaries in the First Half of Advanced LIGO's and Advanced Virgo's Third Observing Run.

Physical review letters·2022

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Pelvic lymph node involvement significantly worsens prostate cancer prognosis.
  • Traditional staging methods like fine-needle aspiration lack reliability.
  • Open lymphadenectomy is effective but highly invasive and morbid.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPLND) for prostate cancer staging.
  • To compare LPLND with traditional open lymphadenectomy.
  • To identify patient selection criteria for LPLND.

Main Methods:

  • Review of LPLND as a minimally invasive surgical technique.
  • Comparison of staging accuracy and morbidity between LPLND and open lymphadenectomy.
  • Analysis of clinical indicators (PSA, grade, stage) for selecting high-risk patients.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • LPLND achieves equivalent staging accuracy to open lymphadenectomy.
  • LPLND demonstrates significantly lower morbidity compared to open surgery.
  • Improved early detection of prostate cancer has reduced the incidence of lymph node metastasis.

Conclusions:

  • LPLND is a valid and effective minimally invasive option for staging prostate cancer in high-risk patients.
  • The laparoscopic approach offers improved patient outcomes regarding morbidity.
  • Urologists must consider the training and resource investment for LPLND implementation.