Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Static progressive splinting.

Karen Schultz-Johnson1

  • 1Rocky Mountain Hand Therapy, Edwards, Colorado 81632, USA. handksj@vail.net

Journal of Hand Therapy : Official Journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists
|June 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Static progressive splinting uses inelastic components to maximize joint range of motion. This approach applies controlled stress, allowing for tissue lengthening and improved patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional capacity evaluation following flexor tendon injury.

Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Handยท2002
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Biomechanical Engineering

Background:

  • Joint stiffness and limited range of motion (ROM) significantly impair function.
  • Traditional therapies may not achieve optimal outcomes for complex joint restrictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of static progressive splinting (SPS).
  • To detail the indications, contraindications, advantages, and mechanics of SPS.
  • To compare different methods of achieving static progressive splinting.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the principles of static progressive splinting, including torque application and end-range positioning.
  • Explanation of how tissue adapts to controlled stress for progressive ROM gains.
  • Comparison of various static progressive splinting techniques and their application across different mobilizing splint designs.

Main Results:

  • Static progressive splinting maximizes total end-range time, leading to increased passive range of motion.
  • The approach allows for precise joint positioning and patient-controlled stress application.
  • High levels of patient satisfaction and compliance are reported with static progressive splinting.

Conclusions:

  • Static progressive splinting is an effective treatment for increasing passive range of motion.
  • Its unique mechanics and patient-controlled stress make it a powerful therapeutic option.
  • Static progressive splinting offers a valuable approach in clinical practice for managing joint mobility issues.

Related Experiment Videos