Review of the utilisation of a university hospital in Barcelona (Spain): evolution 1992-1996
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

Standardization of Basket Use in Sialendoscopy: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study
Published on: June 6, 2025
G Navarro1, A Prat-Marin, M Asenjo
1Department of Preventive Medicine and Technical Management, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic Medical School, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
To test the applicability of the appropriateness evaluation protocol (AEP) as a tool for reviewing hospital utilisation. To quantify and to compare the rate of inappropriate admissions and amount of in-hospital days, emphasising the main causes and factors in the hospital associated with inappropriateness during the studied periods of time.
Patients And Methods:
Two retrospective studies were carried out, the first one in 1992, when 2048 clinical histories were analysed, and the second in 1996, with 1099 reviewed histories. The tool used for the evaluation of the level of hospital utilisation is the AEP.
Results:
The proportion of admissions considered to be inappropriate was 25% (95% CI: 20.8-24.5) in 1992, and 16% (95% CI: 13.8-18.2) in 1996. Premature admission was the most frequent cause of inappropriateness in both periods. The logistic regression model built for the dependent variable admission showed the following variables to be associated to inappropriateness: scheduled admission (OR: 15; 95% CI: 10.8-20.7) and (OR: 10; 95% CI: 6-16.5), weekend admission (OR: 2; 95% CI: 1.3-1.2) and (OR: 2; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3), for 1992 and 1996, respectively. The rate of inappropriate in-hospital stays in 1992 was 29% (95% CI: 28.3-29.6), and 13.5% (95% CI: 12.7-14.3) in 1996. Hospital organisational problems were the main cause of inappropriate in-hospital days in 1992, and diagnostic/ therapeutical tests that could be performed ambulatorily ranked first in 1996. The logistic regression model built for the dependent variable in-hospital days had the following independent variables associated to its inappropriateness: discharge on weekdays (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2-1.8) and (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5-0.8) and length of stay (OR: 2; 95% CI: 1.8-2.4) and (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 2.3-2.5), for 1992 and 1996 respectively, among other variables.
Conclusion:
Periodic checking of the utilisation levels with the application of methods such as the AEP will contribute towards adapting hospital management in the more competitive current setting.
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in hospitals have...
Hospitals-I
Tertiary Healthcare System
Secondary Healthcare System
Healthcare Agencies II
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources, and lay...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...