Science at a crossroads

Area of Science:

• Science and economics
• Innovation and economic growth
• Physical sciences, life sciences, mathematics, and engineering

Background:

• The integration of science with the economy is accelerating innovation.
• A 'cascade paradigm' of innovation is crucial for economic growth, even with economic slowdowns.
• Science faces critical challenges to sustain its role in innovation.

Purpose of the Study:

• To identify key challenges facing science in its alliance with the economy.
• To propose solutions for sustaining scientific advancement and its economic impact.
• To advocate for changes in federal research funding and organizational structures.

Main Methods:

• Analysis of the current state of science funding and talent in physical sciences versus life sciences.
• Examination of the impact of interdisciplinary research on scientific advancement.
• Review of federal science support structures in relation to modern research needs.

Main Results:

• Physical sciences (including mathematics and engineering) lack the strong advocacy model seen in life sciences for securing federal funding.
• There is a concerning decline in the number of physical scientists and engineers, threatening future scientific progress.
• Federal science support structures remain largely unchanged since the Cold War, despite the increasing interdisciplinary nature of modern science.

Conclusions:

• Physical sciences require a robust advocacy model to secure adequate federal research funding.
• Reversing the decline in physical scientists and engineers is essential for maintaining scientific momentum.
• Federal science support needs modernization to foster interdisciplinary cooperation across sectors and agencies.