Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical versus quantitative vibration assessment: improving clinical performance.

Ted M Burns1, Anisya Taly, Peter C O'Brien

  • 1Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System : JPNS
|July 2, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Clinical vibration impairment (CVI) often overestimates vibration loss compared to quantitative vibration threshold (QVT) testing. Adjusting for age, height, and weight improves sensory testing accuracy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shared burden of ultra-rare genetic variants across a spectrum of motor neuron diseases.

Translational neurodegeneration·2025
Same author

A Distinctive Pattern of Pathologic Abnormality in Amyloid-like Monoclonal IgM Deposition Neuropathy.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2025
Same author

Distinctive clinical features in biopsy-proven nerve large-arteriole vasculitis and microvasculitis.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2024
Same author

Neurologic Clinical, Electrophysiologic, and Pathologic Characteristics of Primary vs Secondary Neurolymphomatosis.

Neurology·2024
Same author

Nerve transcriptomes in autoimmune and genetic demyelinating neuropathies: Pathogenic pathway assessment of nerve demyelination.

Journal of neuroimmunology·2023
Same author

Measuring treatment adverse event burden in myasthenia gravis: Single-center prospective evaluation utilizing the Adverse Event Unit (AEU).

Muscle & nerve·2023

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology

Background:

  • Assessing vibration sensation is crucial for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy.
  • Clinical vibration impairment (CVI) using a tuning fork is a common bedside test.
  • Quantitative vibration threshold (QVT) offers a more objective measure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of CVI with QVT in assessing vibration sensation.
  • To identify factors influencing the discrepancy between CVI and QVT.
  • To validate QVT as a measure of neuropathy severity.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of CVI and QVT across three large patient cohorts (n=787).
  • Stepwise multivariate analysis to assess demographic and anthropomorphic factors.
  • Correlation analysis with a composite nerve conduction abnormality score.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant associations found between CVI and QVT in all cohorts.
  • CVI frequently overestimated vibration loss compared to QVT, especially when performed by multiple physicians.
  • Discordance between CVI and QVT correlated with age, height, and body surface area (BSA).
  • QVT showed a stronger correlation with nerve conduction abnormalities than CVI.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative vibration threshold (QVT) is a more reliable measure of vibration sensation than clinical vibration impairment (CVI).
  • Physicians should consider patient age, height, and weight (BSA) when interpreting vibration testing.
  • Quantitative sensory testing methods enhance the accuracy of clinical sensory assessments.