Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[The difficult rectal stump].

Y Panis1

  • 1Service de chirurgie générale et digestive, hôpital Lariboisière, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75475 Paris, France. yves.panis@lrb.ap-hop-paris.fr

Annales De Chirurgie
|July 4, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of surgical management and outcomes of acute right colic and sigmoid diverticulitis: a French national retrospective cohort study.

Techniques in coloproctology·2024
Same author

Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage in male rectal cancer surgery (GRECCAR10), a randomized clinical trial.

Techniques in coloproctology·2024
Same author

Risk factors for severe morbidity and definitive stoma after elective surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis: a multicenter national cohort study.

Techniques in coloproctology·2024
Same author

What is the best surgical option after failure of graciloplasty in patients with recurrent rectovaginal fistula? A study of 19 consecutive patients.

Techniques in coloproctology·2022
Same author

Mesorectal failure after chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: is sphincter-saving surgery reasonable?

Techniques in coloproctology·2022
Same author

C-reactive protein monitoring after ileocecal resection and stoma closure reduces length of hospital stay: a prospective case-matched study in 410 patients with Crohn's disease.

Techniques in coloproctology·2022
Same journal

[The prevention of intestinal obstruction related to adhesions].

Annales de chirurgie·2006
Same journal

WITHDRAWN: Et maintenant une revue unique : le nouveau Journal de chirurgie WITHDRAWN: And now a single journal, the new "Journal of surgery"

Annales de chirurgie·2006
Same journal

[Results of resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head].

Annales de chirurgie·2006
Same journal

[Results of pancreatic cancer surgery].

Annales de chirurgie·2006
Same journal

[Results of resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer].

Annales de chirurgie·2006
Same journal

[Reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy?].

Annales de chirurgie·2006
See all related articles

Struggling with rectal stump closure during rectal cancer surgery, especially in obese patients? Alternative techniques like TA30, sutures, or manual colo-anal anastomosis offer solutions when standard staplers fail.

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Context:

  • Rectal cancer surgery often involves proctectomy and low colorectal anastomosis.
  • Obese patients present unique challenges in rectal stump closure and stapling.
  • Standard stapling devices like TA55 can be difficult to use in these cases.

Purpose:

  • To explore alternative methods for rectal stump closure and anastomosis in challenging rectal cancer surgeries.
  • To provide solutions when standard stapling devices are not feasible.
  • To ensure safe and effective low colorectal or colo-anal anastomosis.

Summary:

  • Difficulties in rectal stump closure with TA55 during proctectomy for rectal cancer, particularly in obese patients, necessitate alternative approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Options include using different staplers (TA30, Roticulator), manual sutures, laparoscopic devices (endoGIA), or performing a manual colo-anal anastomosis after rectal version.
  • These methods aim to overcome technical challenges and achieve secure anastomosis.

    • Impact:

    • Improved surgical outcomes for rectal cancer patients, especially those with challenging anatomy.
    • Expanded options for surgeons when standard stapling techniques are compromised.
    • Enhanced safety and efficacy of low colorectal and colo-anal anastomosis procedures.