Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Abacavir substitution for nucleoside analogs in patients with HIV lipoatrophy: a randomized trial
Andrew Carr1, Cassy Workman, Don E Smith
1HIV, Immunology and Infectious Diseases Clinical Services Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, 2010 Australia. acarr@stvincents.com.au
Context:
Peripheral lipoatrophy may complicate antiretroviral therapy of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, often related to duration and type of nucleoside analog therapy, and may have a mitochondrial pathogenesis. No proven therapy exists for lipoatrophy, but abacavir is a nucleoside analog that may be less toxic to mitochondria.
Objective:
To determine if substitution of stavudine or zidovudine with abacavir improves HIV lipoatrophy without affecting control of HIV replication.
Design:
Randomized, open-label 24-week study.
Setting:
Seventeen hospital HIV outpatient clinics and primary care centers in Australia and England, with randomization from June 2000 through January 2001.
Participants:
A total of 111 adults (109 men) with moderate or severe lipoatrophy who were receiving stavudine (n = 85) or zidovudine (n = 26) and had stable plasma HIV RNA levels below 400 copies/mL and no prior abacavir therapy.
Intervention:
Patients were randomly assigned to switch from stavudine or zidovudine to abacavir, 300 mg twice per day, while continuing all other antiretroviral therapy (n = 54) or to continue all antiretroviral therapy (n = 57).
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary end point was limb fat mass, measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; key secondary end points were plasma HIV RNA levels, adverse events, physician-assessed (via subjective measures) lipodystrophy severity, total and central fat mass, and fasting metabolic (lipid, glycemic, and lactate) levels.
Results:
There was a significant increase in limb fat in the abacavir group relative to the stavudine/zidovudine group (0.39 vs 0.08 kg; mean difference, 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.57 kg), as well as significant relative increases in subcutaneous thigh (P =.01), arm (P<.001), and abdominal (P =.001) fat areas on computed tomography. Switching had no significant effect on secondary end points, including plasma HIV RNA (for unadjusted comparison between groups at week 24, odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.48-3.96). Change in limb fat mass at week 24 did not correlate with change in subjectively determined perceived lipoatrophy severity (r = -0.06; P =.53 by Spearman correlation). Hypersensitivity to abacavir was seen in 5 patients (10%).
Conclusions:
In this sample of lipoatrophic HIV-infected adults, switching from stavudine or zidovudine to abacavir for 24 weeks led to significant, albeit modest, objectively measured increases in limb fat. Clinical lipoatrophy, as assessed subjectively, did not resolve, however, and at the rate of increase observed may take years to resolve with use of this strategy. Longer-term follow-up is needed.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Subviral Agents
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Retroviruses
Lipid Absorption
These breakdown products bind with bile salts and lecithin to form micelles, which quickly pass between microvilli to come in close contact with the apical...

