Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals.

Peter C Austin1, Janet E Hux

  • 1Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. peter.austin@ices.on.ca

Journal of Vascular Surgery
|July 4, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing covariate balance when using the generalized propensity score with quantitative or continuous exposures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2018
Same author

Effect of Electrophysiology Assessment on Mortality and Hospitalizations in Patients With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation.

The American journal of cardiology·2018
Same author

Heart rate in patients with reduced ejection fraction: relationship between single time point measurement and mean heart rate on prolonged implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2018
Same author

The Impact of Diabetes on Breast Cancer Treatments and Outcomes: A Population-Based Study.

Diabetes care·2018
Same author

Validation of prediction models: examining temporal and geographic stability of baseline risk and estimated covariate effects.

Diagnostic and prognostic research·2018
Same author

Association of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with non-fatal cardiac and non-cardiac events: a CANHEART substudy.

Open heart·2018
Same journal

Self-Expandable versus Balloon-Expandable Bridging Stents in Off-the-Shelf Inner Branch Repair: Midterm Results from the INBREED Registry.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Procedural outcomes and follow-up of endovascular treatment for extracranial carotid artery aneurysms; a systematic review.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Impact of Insurance Status on Urgency of Presentation and Perioperative Outcomes Following Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Vascular Quality Initiative Analysis.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Large language models routinely overcode peripheral endovascular procedures relative to professional coders.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Deep and Non-Deep Hypothermia in Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Horner Syndrome Secondary to Giant Shamblin Type III Carotid Body Tumor.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
See all related articles

Statistical significance testing using confidence intervals can be misleading. Overlapping confidence intervals do not always indicate a lack of statistically significant difference between two means at the alpha = 0.05 level.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Clinical researchers often use confidence interval overlap to infer statistical significance.
  • This method is widely applied in various scientific disciplines for comparing group means.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that overlapping confidence intervals do not preclude statistically significant differences between two means.
  • To highlight a common misconception in statistical analysis within clinical research.

Main Methods:

  • The study conceptually illustrates the relationship between confidence interval overlap and statistical significance.
  • It focuses on the interpretation of 95% confidence intervals for comparing two sample means.

Main Results:

  • Confidence intervals for two means can overlap even when the difference between the means is statistically significant at the alpha = 0.05 level.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Visual or intuitive assessment of overlap can lead to incorrect conclusions about statistical significance.

    • Conclusions:

    • Relying solely on confidence interval overlap for determining statistical significance is not a reliable method.
    • Researchers should use formal hypothesis testing or consider effect sizes alongside confidence intervals for accurate interpretation.