Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: a pilot study.

Meredith A B Makeham1, Susan M Dovey, Mary County

  • 1Department of General Practice, University of Sydney, 37a Booth Street, Balmain, NSW 2041, Australia. makeham@ozemail.com.au

The Medical Journal of Australia
|July 6, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Virtual care in residential aged care and primary care settings: a systematic literature review using the SEIPS framework.

International journal of medical informatics·2025
Same author

Before the East African Radiation: Sex Chromosome Systems in Basal Haplotilapiine Cichlids.

Genome biology and evolution·2025
Same author

Evaluating primary care expenditure in Australia: the Primary Care Spend (PC Spend) model.

The Medical journal of Australia·2025
Same author

Hospital Testing of the Effectiveness of Co-Designed Educational Materials to Improve Patient and Visitor Knowledge and Confidence in Reporting Patient Deterioration.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2023
Same author

PANORAMIC: important insights into molnupiravir use in COVID-19.

Lancet (London, England)·2022
Same author

Interventions to address potentially inappropriate prescriptions and over-the-counter medication use among adults 65 years and older in primary care settings: protocol for a systematic review.

Systematic reviews·2022
Same journal

Still Treating Yesterday's Risk? Reconsidering Antiviral Use for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Cases in a Broadly Immune Population.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Striving for Racial Equity in Oral Cancer Research: A Case Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Self-Poisoning With Prazosin and Its Off-Label Use in Australia, 2014-2024: Analysis of NSW Poisons Information Centre Data.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Drivers of Vaccine Uptake for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children to Inform Tailored Strategies: A Qualitative Study Exploring Health Service Provider Perspective.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Four Urgent Actions for the Rights to Culturally Safe Breastfeeding for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mothers and Babies to Breastfeed in Neonatal Intensive Care Environments.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
See all related articles

This pilot study developed an international taxonomy for general practitioner (GP) errors. Findings suggest patient harm from GP errors is similar across countries with comparable healthcare systems.

Area of Science:

  • Medical error analysis
  • Primary healthcare research
  • International comparative studies

Background:

  • General practitioners (GPs) are crucial in primary care.
  • Understanding medical errors in general practice is essential for patient safety.
  • International variations in error reporting require investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish an international taxonomy for errors reported by general practitioners.
  • To compare error types and consequences across different countries.
  • To identify similarities and differences in primary care errors.

Main Methods:

  • An observational pilot study involving GPs from Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the UK, and the US.
  • Anonymous electronic reporting of errors to a central database.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of reported errors and their consequences by international investigators.

    • Main Results:

    • A five-level taxonomy with 171 error types was developed.
    • Process errors constituted the majority (approx. 80%) of reported errors in both Australia and other countries.
    • Patient harm was reported in about 30-32% of cases, with "very serious" harm noted in 9% of Australian reports versus 3% in others.

    Conclusions:

    • General practice errors appear to impact patients similarly in countries with comparable healthcare systems.
    • Further comparative research is needed to fully understand differences in general practice errors.
    • The developed taxonomy provides a framework for future error analysis in primary care.