[Prospective feasibility study of chest X-ray vs. thoracic MRI in breath-hold technique at an open low-field scanner]

MR investigations using a breath-hold sequence at an open low-field MR had to be compared to chest X-rays in patients with a wide spectrum of cardio-thoracic pathologies.

114 patients and three volunteers who actually received a chest X-ray due to different indications underwent triplanar breath-hold (17 - 20 s) True-FISP sequence using a 0.2 T low-field MR (Siemens Magnetom Open, TR/TE/alpha: 7.3/3.5/80 degrees, SD: 10 mm, Pixel: 2.81 x 1.41 mm) a mean of 5.1 (+/- 8.2) days later.

Signal-to-noise ratio as basics for pattern recognition was 3.2 in nodule, 5.0 in infiltration, and 12.0 in effusion, and therefore True-FISP is usable for the detection of these findings. MRI demonstrated nodules (89 % vs. 57 %), infiltration (81 % vs. 71 %), pleural effusions (86 % vs. 75 %), pericardial effusions (100 % vs. 21 %) and pulmonary congestion (90 % vs. 80 %) clearly more frequently compared to chest X-ray.

MRI of the lung has been implemented successfully at an open low-field MR system. Diagnostic safety and accuracy are at least comparable to those of chest X-ray. The lack of superimposition led to a major improvement in the detection of pericardial effusions and nodules, and an increase in identification of infiltration, pleural effusion, and pulmonary congestion.