Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Defining hormesis: comments on Calabrese and Baldwin (2002).

P M Chapman1

  • 1EVS Environment Consultants, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. pchapman@attglobal.net

Human & Experimental Toxicology
|July 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Hormesis definition should exclude value judgments. Evaluating hormesis significance requires risk-benefit analysis, considering its potentially Lamarckian evolutionary basis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Presentation and interpretation of Sediment Quality Triad data.

Ecotoxicology (London, England)·2013
Same author

On Cardiography, with Special Reference to the Relation of the Time of Duration of Ventricular Systole to that of Diastolic Interval.

Medico-chirurgical transactions·2010
Same author

On the Treatment of Empyema.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Remarks on the Heart-Index Interval in Aortic Regurgitation.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

SOME EXPERIMENTS IN DENSIMETRY: WITH A VIEW TO ASCERTAINING THE PERCENTAGES OF CHLOROFORM SUPPLIED BY JUNKER'S INHALER.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Development of a (silent) speech recognition system for patients following laryngectomy.

Medical engineering & physics·2007

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • The concept of hormesis, characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition, is debated.
  • Current definitions may incorporate subjective beneficial or harmful assessments, complicating objective analysis.

Discussion:

  • Hormesis evaluation necessitates rigorous risk:risk comparisons, moving beyond simple benefit-harm dichotomies.
  • The evolutionary underpinnings of hormesis may be Lamarckian, contrasting with Darwinian principles, which impacts its interpretation.
  • The scope of the term 'hormesis' is questioned, particularly regarding its applicability to responses beyond single species or including arousal phenomena.

Key Insights:

  • Objective definition of hormesis is crucial, excluding non-scientific value judgments.
  • Risk:risk assessment is essential for understanding the true significance of hormesis.
  • The evolutionary basis of hormesis warrants further investigation.

Outlook:

  • Future research should focus on refining the definition of hormesis for broader applicability.
  • Investigating the evolutionary origins of hormesis will clarify its biological relevance.
  • Developing standardized methodologies for risk:risk comparisons will enhance hormesis research.

Related Experiment Videos