Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do stentless valves make a difference?

Xu Y Jin1, John R Pepper

  • 1Department of Academic Surgery, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery : Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
|July 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanical support of the heart: Where are we heading?

The International journal of artificial organs·2021
Same author

Personalised external aortic root support for elective treatment of aortic root dilation in 200 patients.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2021
Same author

Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Frontiers of medicine·2021
Same author

The risk of misdiagnosis in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a review of current guidelines.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2020
Same author

Long-term survival after xenograft versus homograft aortic root replacement: Results from a prospective randomized trial.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2019
Same author

Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics assessment of thoracic aorta blood flow: a literature review.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2019
Same journal

Mitral valve anomalies in transposition of the great arteries.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same journal

Oncologic Safety of Omitting Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Segmentectomy for Ground-Glass Opacity-Dominant Lung Cancer: A Supplementary Analysis of JCOG1211.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same journal

Progress in Thymic Malignancy Care: The Imperative for Global Standards and Collaboration.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same journal

Association between interventional cardiologist practice characteristics, CABG use, and clinical outcomes.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same journal

The EACTS Innovation Committee's Perspective on the "Heart Valve of the Future".

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same journal

Why Should the Current Generation of Surgical Residents be Academically Active-Lessons From the Past.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
See all related articles

Stentless bioprosthetic valves offer superior hemodynamics and left ventricular remodeling compared to early stented valves. This review explores why these advanced aortic valves remain underutilized despite proven benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Prosthetic Valve Technology

Background:

  • Stentless glutaraldehyde-preserved bioprosthetic valves were introduced in 1988.
  • Early studies showed aortic homografts had better structural valve durability than first-generation stented porcine valves.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the hemodynamic characteristics of stentless aortic valves.
  • To explain the paradox of their limited clinical adoption despite advantages.

Main Methods:

  • Review of long-term observational studies.
  • Analysis of hemodynamic investigations over a decade.

Main Results:

  • Stentless valves demonstrate superior hemodynamics, including lower transvalvular pressure gradients and larger effective orifice areas.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Studies show more complete regression of left ventricular hypertrophy with stentless valves.
  • Despite benefits, stentless valves have not achieved widespread adoption.

    • Conclusions:

    • Stentless aortic valves offer significant hemodynamic and clinical advantages.
    • The reasons for their underutilization require further investigation and explanation.