Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Observer study involving laser-digitized versus CCD-digitized images.

Kenneth W Clark1, William B Dawson, Edward Muka

  • 1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. clarkk@mir.wustl.edu

Journal of Digital Imaging
|July 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microbial isolation and characterization from two flex lines from the urine processor assembly onboard the international space station.

Biofilm·2023
Same author

Myocardial Cut-off Sign is a Sensitive and Specific Cardiac Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sign to Distinguish Left Ventricular Pseudoaneurysms From True Aneurysms.

Journal of thoracic imaging·2020
Same author

Epidemiology of Hepatic Steatosis at a Tertiary Care Center: An MRI-based Analysis.

Academic radiology·2017
Same author

Thrombolysis is an Independent Risk Factor for Poor Outcome After Carotid Revascularization.

Neurosurgery·2017
Same author

De-identification of Medical Images with Retention of Scientific Research Value.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2015
Same author

Histogram analysis for characterization of indeterminate adrenal nodules on noncontrast CT.

Abdominal imaging·2014

Radiologists found minimal image quality differences between laser and CCD digital imaging systems. Laser digitizers were slightly preferred, but not significantly, suggesting other factors should guide equipment choice.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Digital Image Processing

Background:

  • Digital imaging is crucial in modern radiology.
  • Laser and CCD digitizers are common technologies for converting film images to digital formats.
  • Assessing perceived image quality is essential for diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the perceived image quality of laser-digitized versus CCD-digitized radiographic images.
  • To determine if significant differences in image quality exist between the two digitization technologies.
  • To inform decisions regarding medical imaging equipment selection.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty two- and three-view radiographic studies (ankles, chests, c-spines, shoulders) were digitized using calibrated laser (Kodak Lumisys 75) and CCD (VIDAR SIERRA Plus) systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Six radiologists independently evaluated blinded, side-by-side comparisons of matching digitized images on high-resolution monitors.
  • Image quality was scored based on diagnostic criteria, with options for 'no different,' 'slightly different,' or 'significantly different.'

    • Main Results:

    • Out of 7324 total responses, 77.8% indicated no difference in image quality between laser and CCD digitization.
    • 21.9% of responses indicated a slight difference, with 16.0% favoring laser and 5.9% favoring CCD.
    • Only 0.3% of responses indicated a significant difference in image quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Laser-digitized images were perceived as only slightly superior to CCD-digitized images.
    • Perceived image quality differences between laser and CCD digitizers are minimal.
    • Factors such as price, reliability, and usability should be prioritized over minor image quality distinctions when selecting digitizer equipment.