Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Chromosomal aberrations: formation, identification and distribution.

G Obe1, P Pfeiffer, J R K Savage

  • 1University of Essen, Department of Genetics, Essen, Germany. guenter.obe@uni-essen.de

Mutation Research
|July 11, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Granzyme B PET Imaging of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combinations in Colon Cancer Phenotypes.

Molecular imaging and biology·2020
Same author

Chromosomal aberrations induced by the restriction endonucleases Alu I and Bam HI: Comparison with X-rays.

Biologisches Zentralblatt·2018
Same author

From DNA damage to chromosome aberrations: joining the break.

Mutation research·2013
Same author

Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells.

Mutagenesis·2010
Same author

Close encounters: RIDGEs, hyperacetylated chromatin, radiation breakpoints and genes differentially expressed in tumors cluster at specific human chromosome regions.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2010
Same author

Karyological Features of Achyrocline (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae): stable karyotypes, low DNA content variation and linkage of rRNA genes.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2010
Same journal

Monoallelic germline RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 variants in hereditary cancer testing: Variant spectrum and clinical counselling implications.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma associated biomarkers in TP53 gene; A comprehensive in silico analysis.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

IDH1 mutation promotes angiogenesis via upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha in glial tumors.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

Targeting overexpressed oncogenes in esophageal cancer through miRNA-mediated gene silencing: Insights from binding affinity and thermodynamic profiling.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

The active compound quercetin from Polygonum cuspidatum targets COL3A1 to enhance CD8⁺ T cell cytotoxicity in gastric cancer.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

E2F1 promotes LIHC malignant phenotype via NEK2-mediated Wnt/β-catenin and Notch activation and EMT.

Mutation research·2026
See all related articles

Chromosomal aberrations (CA) result from DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) reveals non-random CA breakpoint distribution, particularly in active chromatin and subtelomeric regions.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cytogenetics

Background:

  • Chromosomal aberrations (CA) represent DNA changes arising from DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair.
  • Understanding the origin and distribution of CA is crucial for comprehending genomic instability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the complexities of chromosomal aberrations using advanced techniques.
  • To elucidate the non-random distribution patterns of CA breakpoints.
  • To explore the role of telomeres and subtelomeric regions in CA formation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) to analyze chromosomal aberrations.
  • Examining the distribution of breakpoints within and between chromosomes.
  • Investigating the association of subtelomeric aberrations with human congenital abnormalities.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • FISH analysis revealed unexpected complexities in CA.
  • CA breakpoints are not randomly distributed, showing preference for active chromatin.
  • Telomeres and subtelomeric regions are significant sites for CA formation, including exchanges and cryptic aberrations.

Conclusions:

  • The origin of CA is more complex than previously thought, influenced by non-random breakpoint distribution.
  • Chromosome arrangement in the interphase nucleus and varying chromosome sensitivities contribute to CA patterns.
  • Subtelomeric aberrations are linked to human congenital abnormalities, highlighting their clinical relevance.