Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Microbiological Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Pulmonary Infectious Diseases
Published on: March 1, 2024
[Efficacy of monotherapy by meropenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia]
1Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital del Mar, Paseo Maritimo 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. 16839@imas.imim.es
Abstract:
We performed a prospective, open label, randomized study in intensive care unit patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) to determine the efficacy and safety of empiric intravenous (i.v.) meropenem monotherapy compared with the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin. A total of 140 patients receiving mechanical ventilation and diagnosed with pneumonia were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 g meropenem i.v. every 8 hours or 2 g ceftazidime i.v. every 8 hours plus 15 mg/kg amikacin daily, administered to patients with normal renal function as two daily doses. Satisfactory clinical responses (cure or improvement) were achieved at the end of treatment in 68.1% of meropenem-treated patients and 54.9% in the ceftazidime/amikacin treated group (relative risk 1.25; 95% confidence interval > 1.00, 1.55). When non-evaluable patients were excluded from the analysis, the satisfactory clinical response was 82.5% and 66.1% for the meropenem and ceftazidime/amikacin patients, respectively (p = 0.044). Logistic regression demonstrated that treatment with meropenem and both the basic traumatic and medical pathologies were significantly associated with a satisfactory response. Adverse events judged to be possible or probably related to treatment were reported by seven (10.1%) patients in the meropenem group and by eight patients (11.3%) in the ceftazidime/amikacin group. The results of this study confirm that monotherapy with meropenem is well tolerated and provides superior efficacy to the conventional combination of ceftazidime and amikacin in combating VAP.
Insights
Meropenem monotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy and good tolerability compared to ceftazidime plus amikacin for treating ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in intensive care unit patients.
Area of Science:
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a significant complication in intensive care units.
- Effective antibiotic strategies are crucial for managing VAP.
- Current guidelines often recommend combination therapy for VAP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of empiric meropenem monotherapy versus ceftazidime plus amikacin for VAP.
- To evaluate clinical response rates and adverse events in VAP patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, open-label, randomized study.
- 140 intensive care unit patients with VAP were randomized.
- Treatment groups received either meropenem i.v. or ceftazidime plus amikacin i.v.
Main Results:
- Higher satisfactory clinical response rates with meropenem (68.1%) versus ceftazidime/amikacin (54.9%).
- Excluding non-evaluable patients showed significantly higher response with meropenem (82.5% vs 66.1%, p=0.044).
- Similar rates of treatment-related adverse events between groups (10.1% vs 11.3%).
Conclusions:
- Meropenem monotherapy is well-tolerated and offers superior efficacy for VAP.
- Meropenem represents an effective alternative to combination therapy for VAP.
- Empiric meropenem monotherapy is a viable treatment option for VAP.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Atypical Pneumonia
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Pneumonia I: Introduction

