Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual illusions affect planning but not control.

Scott Glover1

  • 1Dept of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 541 Moore Bldg, 16402, University Park, PA, USA

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|July 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Online versus cognitive control: A dividing line between physical action and motor imagery.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

A Qualitative Investigation into the Experiences of Students with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD/Dyspraxia) in Higher Education.

European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education·2024
Same author

TMS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects the timing of motor imagery but not overt action: Further support for the motor-cognitive model.

Behavioural brain research·2022
Same author

Assessing evidence for replication: A likelihood-based approach.

Behavior research methods·2020
Same author

Executive functions in motor imagery: support for the motor-cognitive model over the functional equivalence model.

Experimental brain research·2020
Same author

Solo versus joint bimanual coordination.

Experimental brain research·2018
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Visual illusions impact action planning but not real-time movement control. Dynamic illusion effects, where influence wanes during movement, support this theory, challenging other models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The impact of visual illusions on human action is inconsistent, leading to debate.
  • Existing models struggle to explain why illusions affect actions variably.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and provide evidence for a new model explaining the variable effects of visual illusions on action.
  • To differentiate the roles of action planning and on-line control in visual illusion effects.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on visual illusions and action.
  • Analysis of recent studies demonstrating 'dynamic illusion effects' in human movements.
  • Comparison of proposed model with alternative explanations for illusion effects on action.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Visual illusions appear to influence the planning stages of action execution.
  • On-line, real-time control of actions is not significantly affected by visual illusions.
  • Dynamic illusion effects show a diminishing influence of illusions as movement progresses.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed model, distinguishing between action planning and on-line control, best explains the pattern of visual illusion effects on action.
  • Dynamic illusion effects provide critical evidence supporting the proposed model.
  • This framework offers a novel perspective on how visual perception interacts with motor control.