Related Experiment Videos
Testing strategies for diagnosing lupus anticoagulant: decision analysis
Jodi B Segal1, Harold P Lehmann, Michelle Petri
1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. jsegal@jhmi.edu
American Journal of Hematology
|July 12, 2002
Summary
The most cost-effective approach for detecting lupus anticoagulant (LA) in patients with thrombosis or prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is often no testing. For systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, tissue thromboplastin time (TTI) testing offers high utility.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Medical Decision Making
Background:
- Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing is crucial for patients with thrombosis or prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).
- Current diagnostic strategies for LA involve various combinations of coagulation assays.
- Optimizing LA detection requires evaluating cost-effectiveness and patient utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare different diagnostic strategies for lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection.
- To determine the most cost-effective and highest utility strategies for LA testing in specific clinical settings.
- To inform potential modifications in current clinical practices for LA evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Decision-modeling techniques, including a decision tree with 12 distinct LA detection strategies.
- Incorporation of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), dilute Russell viper venom times (dRVVT), tissue thromboplastin time (TTI), and other assays.
- Utilized literature data for probabilities, costs, and patient utilities to model outcomes.
Main Results:
- The least costly strategy for patients with thrombosis or prolonged aPTT is no testing.
- For patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), not testing is least expensive, but TTI alone is also efficient.
- TTI followed by dRVVT provides the highest utility for SLE patients.
Conclusions:
- Current clinician strategies for LA detection may require modification based on cost-effectiveness and patient utility.
- The optimal strategy for LA detection varies depending on the clinical context and patient population.
- Further validation of modified LA detection strategies through clinical trials is recommended.