Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of spatial normalization procedures and their impact on functional maps.

Fabrice Crivello1, Thorsten Schormann, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer

  • 1Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, UMR 6095, CNRS-CEA LRC36V Université de Caen & Paris 5, Caen, France. crivello@cyceron.fr

Human Brain Mapping
|July 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The exposome of brain aging across 34 countries.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Shared genetic architecture of brain age gap across 30 cohorts worldwide.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Public Health.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Retinal Microvascular Correlates of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in Older Age.

Neurology·2025
Same author

Fronto-Parietal and Cerebellar Circuits Characterize Individuals With Higher Trait Anxiety.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

White matter hyperintensity spatial patterns: Risk factors and clinical correlates.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025

Accurate brain spatial normalization is crucial for functional imaging. Full multi-grid (FMG) offers superior anatomical alignment, but precise anatomical registration has minimal impact on low-resolution functional maps.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • Brain Mapping

Background:

  • Spatial normalization aligns individual brain scans to a standard template.
  • Accurate normalization is essential for group-level analysis in neuroimaging studies.
  • Different normalization algorithms vary in their accuracy and impact on functional data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the alignment accuracy of four spatial normalization methods: affine (AFF), polynomial warp (WRP), SPM, and full multi-grid (FMG).
  • To evaluate the impact of these normalization methods on functional maps derived from PET imaging.
  • To assess the influence of normalization on intersubject variability in structural and functional brain data.

Main Methods:

  • Four spatial normalization techniques (AFF, WRP, SPM, FMG) were applied to high-resolution brain MRI and functional PET data from 20 subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Individual brain volumes were warped to the Human Brain Atlas (HBA) template.
  • Structural volumes, tissue probability maps, and functional activation maps were compared across methods.

    • Main Results:

    • FMG demonstrated superior alignment accuracy for grey and white matter compared to AFF, WRP, and SPM.
    • WRP and SPM showed similar performance, while AFF had the lowest accuracy.
    • SPM excelled in normalizing intra-cerebral cerebrospinal fluid, particularly in ventricular regions.
    • Low-resolution functional maps (FWHM ~10 mm) showed limited differences and high overlap (42.8%) regardless of normalization method.
    • At higher resolution (FWHM ~6 mm), normalization method significantly impacted activated area localization, reducing overlap to 6.2%.

    Conclusions:

    • FMG provides enhanced anatomical alignment accuracy.
    • Precise anatomical normalization has minimal influence on low-resolution functional maps due to larger functional variability.
    • Normalization method becomes critical for accurate localization of functional activations at higher spatial resolutions.