Long-term clinical outcomes after coronary angioplasty using long stents in small coronary vessels

Gian Battista Danzi1, Marco Sesana, Cinzia Capuano

  • 1Catheterization Laboratory, Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italy. gbdanzi@mail.com

Insights

Coronary stenting in small vessels showed similar procedural success with short or long stents. While longer stents had a trend towards more revascularization, long-term survival was equivalent.

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Coronary stenting in small vessels (< 2.5 mm) and long lesions presents challenges.
  • The optimal stent length for these complex cases remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare procedural, in-hospital, and long-term clinical outcomes of short versus long coronary stents in small vessels.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 252 patients undergoing single stent implantation in small coronary vessels.
  • Patients were divided into short stent (≤ 16 mm) and long stent (≥ 18 mm) groups.
  • Outcomes assessed included procedural success, major adverse cardiac events, and target vessel revascularization.

Main Results:

  • Procedural success rates were similar (98.4% vs. 97.6%).
  • In-hospital adverse events were comparable between groups (1.6% vs. 2.4%).
  • At follow-up, mortality and myocardial infarction rates were similar, but target vessel revascularization trended higher in the long stent group (21.7% vs. 13.9%).

Conclusions:

  • Single short or long stents in small coronary vessels achieve similar procedural success.
  • Despite a trend towards increased revascularization with longer stents, 2-year event-free survival was equivalent.