Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Philosophical conjectures and their refutation.

A G Kluge1

  • 1Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079, USA. akluge@umich.edu

Systematic Biology
|July 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Taxic Homology = Overall Similarity.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

Popper and likelihood versus "Popper".

Systematic biology·2002
Same author

Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology.

Molecular biology and evolution·1993
Same author

Methods and molecules.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1988
Same author

The cladistic perspective.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1982
Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026
See all related articles

Karl Popper's corroboration formalism is not a conditional probability. Falsificationism, not verificationism, accurately describes phylogenetic inference methods, refuting claims that statistical probability justifies them.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Phylogenetic Systematics

Background:

  • Sir Karl Popper's corroboration formalism, C(h,e,b), is often misunderstood.
  • Recent arguments suggest C(h,e,b) reduces to conditional probability, misinterpreting Popper as a verificationist.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refute the claim that Popper's corroboration formalism is equivalent to conditional probability.
  • To clarify the role of falsificationism in phylogenetic inference.
  • To address the explanatory power of maximum likelihood in phylogenetic systematics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Karl Popper's derivation of C(h,e,b) from absolute probability and severity of test.
  • Critique of the reduction of Popper's formalism to conditional probability p(e,hb).
  • Examination of the application of falsificationism versus verificationism in phylogenetic systematics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Popper's C(h,e,b) is derived from absolute probability and severity of test, not solely conditional probability.
  • The conjecture p(e,hb) = C(h,e,b) is refuted.
  • Falsificationism, not verificationism, correctly characterizes the parsimony method in phylogenetic systematics.

Conclusions:

  • De Queiroz and Poe's interpretation of Popper's corroboration is incorrect.
  • Statistical probability does not justify the parsimony method in phylogenetics.
  • Maximum likelihood models do not achieve causal explanation in the context of character evolution.