Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Breast cancer risks: some clinically useful approaches.

Patricia T Kelly1

  • 1Cancer Risk Assessment, Saint Francis Memorial Hospital, 824 Cragmont Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94708, USA. ptkelly@ptkelly.com

Current Women'S Health Reports
|July 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Understanding breast cancer risk is clearer when presented in absolute terms, not comparisons. This approach enhances clinical usefulness for average risk, prognosis, hormone therapy, tamoxifen, and BRCA mutations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Women's Health Initiative results: breast cancer risk in perspective.

The breast journalยท2003
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Statistics
  • Risk Communication

Background:

  • Breast cancer risk information is often confusing and misleading.
  • Common risk presentation formats like relative risks and odds ratios can obscure true risk.
  • Clear communication of risk is crucial for patient understanding and clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the clarity and clinical usefulness of presenting breast cancer risk in absolute terms.
  • To evaluate five specific areas of breast cancer risk using absolute risk presentation.
  • To advocate for a shift from comparative risk metrics to absolute risk with a defined timeframe.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of breast cancer risk information across five key areas.
  • Comparison of risk presentation formats: comparative vs. absolute with a timeframe.
  • Focus on average risk, prognosis, hormone replacement therapy, tamoxifen prevention, and BRCA mutations.

Main Results:

  • Presenting breast cancer risk in absolute terms with a timeframe significantly enhances clarity.
  • Comparative risk metrics (relative risks, odds ratios) can be misleading.
  • Absolute risk presentation improves clinical usefulness for diverse risk scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Absolute risk presentation with a timeframe is superior for communicating breast cancer risk.
  • This method aids patients and clinicians in understanding prognosis and treatment implications.
  • A standardized approach using absolute risk is recommended for improved health literacy and decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos