War and peace in phylogenetics: a rejoinder on total evidence and consensus
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
Published on: February 5, 2014
1Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada. claudine.lavasseur@umontreal.ca
Abstract:
For more than 10 years, systematists have been debating the superiority of character or taxonomic congruence in phylogenetic analysis. In this paper, we demonstrate that the competing approaches can converge to the same solution when a consensus method that accounts for branch lengths is selected. Thus, we propose to use both methods in combination, as a way to corroborate the results of combined and separate analyses. This so-called "global congruence" approach is tested with a wide variety of examples sampled from the literature, and the results are compared with those obtained by standard consensus methods. Our analyses show that when the total evidence and consensus trees differ topologically, collapsing weakly supported nodes with low bootstrap support usually improves "global congruence".
Related Concept Videos
The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic Trees
Microbial Phylogeny
Phylogeny

