Related Experiment Videos
Parental attitudes towards early intervention in children at high risk for affective disorders
Robert M Post1, Gabriele S Leverich, Emily Fergus
1Biological Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bldg. 10, Rm. 3S239, 10 Center Drive, MSC-1272, Bethesda, MD 20892-1272, USA.
Background:
Parents volunteered to complete surveys on attitudes toward treatment intervention in children at a theoretically high (20-30%) or very high (70%) risk for affective disorders because of an assumed uni-lineal or bi-lineal family history of bipolar illness.
Methods:
Questions focused on examining at what ages and stage of symptom and syndrome evolution parents would wish their child to begin treatment with different types of therapeutic approaches and clinical trial designs. Sixty percent of the respondents had a personal history of unipolar or bipolar affective disorders.
Results:
In 156 completed surveys, 83% of parents favored acute medication intervention and 67% favored long-term medication treatment for those children at very high risk at or before the development of severe symptoms (i.e. even prior to meeting full diagnostic thresholds). On the average, parents indicated that they would enter their child in a trial of: two types of psychotherapy at a point in illness evolution between moderate and severe symptoms, two types of open medications between severe symptoms and a definite diagnosis, two blind medications at a definite diagnosis, and a blind trial of placebo and medication after a definite diagnosis but before multiple recurrences of the illness. Parents, primarily on the basis of perceived safety, would allow their children to use medications that have been found to be effective in adults.
Limitations:
In addition to a number of methodological limitations, responders to the survey were self-selected.
Conclusions:
The results indicate a willingness on the part of most parents to treat a child at high risk for affective illness early in the course of symptom evolution, even prior to a full syndromic illness or diagnosis. This and other parental views of the risk-benefit and ethical dimensions of early intervention may be helpful in the initiation and design of studies aimed at assessing the efficacy of early interventions in childhood-onset bipolar illness and its prodromes.