Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Current controversies in bone densitometry.

Sydney Lou Bonnick1

  • 1Institute for Women's Health, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas 76204, USA. F_bonnick@venus.twu.edu

Current Opinion in Rheumatology
|July 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Bone densitometry is increasingly used, but its diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis face criticism. Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate clinical practice and patient management.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Going on a drug holiday?

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry·2011
Same author

Patient satisfaction in postmenopausal women treated with a weekly bisphosphonate transitioned to once-monthly ibandronate.

Journal of women's health (2002)·2009
Same author

Descriptive analysis of concomitant prescription medication patterns from 1999 to 2004 among US women receiving daily or weekly oral bisphosphonate therapy.

Gender medicine·2008
Same author

Monitoring changes in bone density.

Women's health (London, England)·2008
Same author

Noninvasive assessments of bone strength.

Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity·2007
Same author

HSA: beyond BMD with DXA.

Bone·2007
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Endocrinology
  • Gerontology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Bone densitometry is widely used for osteoporosis diagnosis and management.
  • Limitations of World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for osteoporosis diagnosis are increasingly apparent.
  • Controversy exists regarding the utility of WHO criteria and densitometry for monitoring therapeutic efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the limitations of current bone densitometry criteria for osteoporosis diagnosis.
  • To address controversies surrounding the use of densitometry in monitoring treatment effectiveness.
  • To clarify the role of bone density measurements in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on bone densitometry and osteoporosis diagnosis.
  • Analysis of criticisms regarding the use of densitometry for therapeutic efficacy monitoring.
  • Examination of statistical concepts like regression to the mean in serial testing.

Main Results:

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for osteoporosis diagnosis based on bone density measurements have limitations.
  • Concerns exist that bone density changes may not accurately reflect fracture risk reduction.
  • Regression to the mean can impact the interpretation of serial bone density tests.

Conclusions:

  • The current criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis using bone densitometry require critical evaluation.
  • The role of densitometry in assessing treatment efficacy needs further clarification.
  • Resolving controversies surrounding bone densitometry is essential for its effective clinical application.

Related Experiment Videos