Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Training and competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

M L Freeman1

  • 1University of Minnesota, Division of Gastroenterology, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Reviews in Gastroenterological Disorders
|July 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Assessing competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy is crucial. Objective performance measures are increasingly vital, as traditional methods like procedure counts are insufficient for ensuring physician skill and patient safety.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resistively loaded coplanar waveguide for microwave measurements of induced carriers.

The Review of scientific instruments·2022
Same author

Proposed thresholds for pancreatic tissue volume for safe intraportal islet autotransplantation after total pancreatectomy.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2013
Same author

Pancreatic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Endoscopy·2011
Same author

Increased cell migration and plasticity in Nrf2-deficient cancer cell lines.

Oncogene·2010
Same author

Endoscopic ultrasound rendezvous for bile duct access using a transduodenal approach: cumulative experience at a single center. A case series.

Endoscopy·2010
Same author

Significant clinical implications of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in previously normal pancreatic ducts.

Endoscopy·2009

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Education
  • Health Professions

Background:

  • Ensuring competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy is a priority for patients and providers.
  • Current methods for assessing competence, such as procedure numbers and subjective proctoring, are often inadequate.
  • Defining and measuring competence in endoscopic procedures remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of current methods for assessing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic competence.
  • To emphasize the growing recognition of objective performance assessment in determining competence.
  • To discuss emerging data on learning curves and outcome variations in GI endoscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and data on competence assessment in GI endoscopy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of learning curves and procedural volume required for technical proficiency.
  • Examination of factors contributing to outcome variations in clinical practice.

    • Main Results:

    • Learning curves for endoscopic procedures are longer than previously assumed, requiring more cases for proficiency.
    • Significant variation exists in clinical endoscopy outcomes, influenced by training, experience, and case volume.
    • Current assessment strategies, including procedure counts and subjective evaluations, do not fully capture true competence.

    Conclusions:

    • Objective assessment of performance is essential for accurately evaluating gastrointestinal endoscopist competence.
    • Rethinking credentialing processes to incorporate objective measures is necessary for patient safety.
    • Future advancements may involve computer-assisted outcome documentation for continuous quality improvement in endoscopy.