Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scientific merit and research ethics.

F Beryl Pilkington1

  • 1School of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Nursing Science Quarterly
|July 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nursing theory still vital to leadership in nursing.

Nursing science quarterly·2014
Same author

Empowerment and mentoring in nursing academia.

International journal of nursing education scholarship·2014
Same author

Type 2 diabetes in vulnerable populations: community healthcare providers' perspectives on health service needs and policy implications.

Canadian journal of diabetes·2014
Same author

A unitary transformative perspective on transformational leadership.

Nursing science quarterly·2014
Same author

Ways of knowing about leadership in nursing.

Nursing science quarterly·2013
Same author

Inclusive mosaic: promoting diversity in nursing through youth mentorship.

International journal of nursing education scholarship·2013

Scientific merit and research ethics are linked, but differing philosophical traditions can cause misunderstandings. Human science nursing must assert its values to ensure ethical healthcare research and practice.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • Scientific merit and research ethics are closely linked.
  • The definition of scientific merit varies across philosophical perspectives and research traditions.
  • Misapplication of natural science criteria to human science research can lead to misunderstandings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of understanding differing research traditions in evaluating scientific merit.
  • To underscore the potential negative implications of misjudging human science research.
  • To advocate for the articulation and pursuit of values and ethics in human science nursing research.

Main Methods:

  • This study is a philosophical analysis and critique.
  • It examines the epistemological differences between natural science and human science traditions.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • It discusses the ethical implications of applying inappropriate evaluation criteria.

    • Main Results:

    • Applying natural science criteria to human science research leads to misinterpretation and misjudgment.
    • This conflict hinders the progress of human science nursing.
    • Societal benefit from humanistic healthcare practices may be compromised.

    Conclusions:

    • Nurses in human science traditions must actively defend their research values and ethical standards.
    • Recognizing and respecting diverse research traditions is crucial for ethical scientific evaluation.
    • Upholding the integrity of human science nursing research is essential for advancing quality of life in healthcare.