Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The spatial properties of opponent-motion normalization.

Stéphane J M Rainville1, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel, Walter L Makous

  • 1Center for Visual Science, Meliora 274, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA. rainville@hpl.crestech.ca

Vision Research
|July 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fiddler crabs (Afruca tangeri) detect second-order motion in both intensity and polarization.

Communications biology·2024
Same author

Interactions between color and gloss in iridescent camouflage.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2023
Same author

Beetle iridescence induces an avoidance response in naïve avian predators.

Animal behaviour·2023
Same author

Background complexity can mitigate poor camouflage.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2021
Same author

The giant panda is cryptic.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Birds learn to avoid aposematic prey by using the appearance of host plants.

Current biology : CB·2021

Human motion perception uses motion contrast (C(m)), normalizing opponent motion energy with flicker energy. This study reveals flicker normalization is localized in orientation, scale, and space, supporting specific visual processing models.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Computational Vision
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • The Adelson-Bergen model calculates net motion from directional energies E(L) and E(R).
  • Human direction discrimination is better explained by motion contrast (C(m)), which normalizes opponent energy by flicker energy.
  • The spatial properties of flicker energy in normalizing opponent energy remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the spatial characteristics of flicker energy in the normalization of opponent motion energy.
  • To test the spatial localization of flicker normalization in orientation, scale, and space.
  • To evaluate the consistency of findings with existing normalization models.

Main Methods:

  • A lateral masking paradigm was employed using a checkerboard stimulus.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli consisted of drifting sinusoids for motion and counterphasing sinusoids for flicker.
  • Motion contrast (C(m)) thresholds were measured by varying flicker check orientation, spatial frequency, and size.

    • Main Results:

    • Observer performance (percent correct) lawfully decreased with reduced motion contrast, validating the C(m) metric.
    • Thresholds improved with increased orientation and spatial-frequency differences between motion and flicker checks.
    • Thresholds decreased as flicker check size increased.

    Conclusions:

    • Findings support models where flicker normalization is localized in orientation, scale, and space, consistent with Georgeson and Scott-Samuel.
    • Data contradict Heeger-type normalization models that use non-selective pooling of inhibitory inputs.
    • Further research is needed to model the spatial and temporal properties of opponent-motion and flicker normalization mechanisms.