Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Resistance to changes in diet.

Richard Shepherd1, Richard Shepherd

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK. R.Sheperd@surrey.ac.uk

The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
|July 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Intervention Aimed at Improving Food Purchasing Behavior: The Front-of-Pack Food Labels Impact on Consumer Choice Study.

JMIR formative research·2019
Same author

Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase the use of traffic light food labelling in UK shoppers (the FLICC trial).

Pilot and feasibility studies·2016
Same author

Guiding healthier food choice: systematic comparison of four front-of-pack labelling systems and their effect on judgements of product healthiness.

The British journal of nutrition·2015
Same author

Henssge nomogram typesetting error.

Forensic science, medicine, and pathology·2013
Same author

EURRECA-A framework for considering evidence in public health nutrition policy development.

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition·2013
Same author

Scientific decision-making and stakeholder consultations: the case of salt recommendations.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2013
Same journal

Nutritional and dietary drivers in the pathogenesis of acute appendicitis: the nutrition-microbiome-genetic axis.

The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society·2026
Same journal

Redistributing power in food systems: How community-led responses move from crisis buffering to systems transformation.

The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society·2026
Same journal

Using positive social influences to increase children's vegetable intake.

The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society·2026
Same journal

Combining sequence-based approaches with anaerobic microbiology and modelling to understand gut microbial communities.

The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society·2026
Same journal

Misled or misfed: Nutrition claims targeting active females on social media, is there research evidence to support them?

The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society·2026
Same journal

Whole-body metabolic modelling and its prospects in precision nutrition.

The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society·2026
See all related articles

Changing eating habits is complex due to multiple influences on food choice, ambivalent attitudes, and optimistic bias, hindering effective dietary interventions and behavior change. Applying models like stages-of-change faces challenges in the dietary field.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Nutrition Science
  • Health Psychology

Background:

  • Dietary changes are challenging at individual and population levels, often occurring slowly.
  • Interventions focusing solely on health are frequently ineffective.
  • Understanding barriers to dietary behavior change is crucial for public health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore reasons for the difficulty in effecting and sustaining dietary changes.
  • To examine the roles of complex food choice influences, attitudinal ambivalence, and optimistic bias.
  • To assess the applicability of behavior change models, such as the stages-of-change model, to dietary behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of factors influencing food choice and dietary behavior.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of psychological concepts including attitudinal ambivalence and optimistic bias in relation to nutrition.
  • Discussion of the limitations in applying established behavior change models to dietary contexts.

    • Main Results:

    • Food choice is multifactorial, extending beyond health concerns, limiting the impact of health-focused interventions.
    • Attitudinal ambivalence and optimistic bias (perceiving oneself as lower risk) can impede the translation of health knowledge into dietary action.
    • The stages-of-change model, successful for smoking cessation, presents challenges for dietary behavior due to less defined targets.

    Conclusions:

    • The complexity of food choice, psychological factors like ambivalence and bias, and model-transfer limitations contribute to the difficulty of dietary behavior change.
    • Future interventions may need to address these multifaceted barriers more comprehensively.
    • Tailoring behavior change strategies to the unique aspects of dietary habits is essential for improved public health outcomes.