Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
[Are there effects due to the existence of coronary collateral circulation on left ventricular function in patients
Izzet Tandoğan1, Tayfun Altinok, Halil Aslan
1Inönü Universitesi Tip Fakültesi Turgut Ozal Tip Merkezi Kardiyoloji ve Radyoloji Anabilim Dallari, Malatya, Ankara. i.tandogan@ttnet.net.tr
Insights
Coronary collateral circulation (CCC) does not prevent left ventricular dysfunction in coronary artery disease. Advanced CCC stages correlate with worse ventricular function, possibly due to more severe underlying disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Ischemic Heart Disease Research
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) impacts left ventricular (LV) function.
- The role of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) in mitigating LV dysfunction in CAD remains debated.
- Understanding CCC's effect is crucial for managing ischemic heart disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) on left ventricular function in patients with ischemic heart disease.
- To determine if CCC offers a protective effect against LV dysfunction in the context of single-vessel coronary artery disease.
- To explore the relationship between the severity of collateralization and LV regional wall motion and ejection fraction.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-six patients with single-vessel disease and significant left anterior descending artery stenosis were enrolled.
- Coronary collateral circulation was assessed using the Rentrop classification (0-3).
- Left ventricular function was evaluated via echocardiography, measuring regional wall motion score and ejection fraction.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in regional wall motion score or ejection fraction was found between patients with and without CCC.
- A positive correlation was observed between higher Rentrop classes (indicating better CCC) and worse regional wall motion scores.
- Patients with the most advanced CCC (Class 3) exhibited the highest wall motion scores, suggesting impaired function.
Conclusions:
- Coronary collateral circulation does not appear to have a preventive effect on left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease.
- Worsening left ventricular function was paradoxically associated with increased stages of CCC.
- This finding may suggest that well-developed collateral circulation is a compensatory response to more severe coronary artery disease.
Objective:
The role of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) on the improvement of left ventricular function in coronary artery disease is controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of CCC on left ventricular function in patients with ischaemic heart disease.
Methods:
Accordingly, 76 patients (39 female, 37 male, mean age--61 +/- 17 years) who had single vessel disease with > 85% narrowing in left anterior descending coronary artery were enrolled in this study. Coronary collateral circulation was determined according to the Rentrop classification (Class 0 = no collateral circulation; class 1 = small branches of occluded vessel fill with CCC; class 2 = epicardial segment of the occluded vessel partially fills with CCC; class 3 = epicardial segment of the occluded vessel totally fills with CCC). Left ventricular function was assessed with echocardiography and left ventricular regional wall motion score (0 = normokinetic; 1 = hypokinetic; 2 = akinetic; 3 = dyskinetic; 4 = aneurysmatic). Rentrop classification of the patients were compared with left ventricular regional wall motion scores and ejection fractions.
Results:
Twenty one of 76 patients had no collateral circulation. The regional wall motion score of class 0 patients was similar with that of patients with CCC (class 1,2,3) (2.28 +/- 2.1 vs 3.39 +/- 2.1, p > 0.05). Particularly, the regional wall motion score was positively correlated with Rentrop classes (p < 0.05). Class 3 patients had the highest wall motion score (4.24 +/- 2.5, p < 0.05). Patients with and without CCC had similar left ventricular ejection fractions (49 +/- 11 vs 46 +/- 17, p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
This study showed that development of CCC has no preventive effect on left ventricular functions in patients with coronary artery disease. Interestingly as the stage of CCC increases left ventricular function worsens. It may be the result of the fact that patients with well developed CCC have more severe coronary artery disease.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Circulation
Coronary circulation begins at the base of the aorta, where two main arteries arise—the left and right coronary arteries. These arteries encircle the heart in the coronary sulcus and supply the...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
