Rural-urban home health care differences before the Balanced Budget Act of 1997

This study arose from concerns that home health care may be more difficult to provide to rural than urban elderly patients (because of geographic barriers, personnel shortages, and other factors) and may therefore be less effective in terms of patient outcomes. Case mix, home health care service use, and outcomes (primarily discharge status) were analyzed for a national random sample of 3,869 rural and urban elderly home health patients. Longitudinal data covered the period from home health admission to discharge or 120 days (whichever occurred first). Primary data collection instruments were designed to obtain longitudinal patient-level health status data; agency records and Medicare data provided service use information. (The study did not address access but focused on services and outcomes after admission to home health care.) Two-group statistical tests and multivariate analyses were employed to assess rural-urban differences. The major findings were that, after adjustment for rural-urban case mix and agency differences, rural compared to urban patients received fewer home health services and attained less favorable discharge outcomes. For example, the rural patients had a higher case mix adjusted hospitalization rate. Because the study data pertain to 1995 through 1996, the results provide a baseline for future analyses of possibly different rural compared to urban effects of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, which resulted in major changes in Medicare payment for home health care.