Related Experiment Videos
A common metric for the Griffiths Scales.
1Lewisham Educational Psychology and Learning Support Service, Bromley, Kent, UK. john.ivens@lineone.net
Archives of Disease in Childhood
|July 26, 2002
Summary
The Griffiths scales (2-8 years) have unique scoring, differing from other developmental tests. A new formula corrects scores for accurate comparisons in child development assessments.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS) are widely used for assessing child development.
- The GMDS General Quotient (GQ) and individual scale scores possess distinct means and standard deviations.
- These statistical properties diverge from the norms of other common developmental assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the statistical differences in scoring between the Griffiths scales and other developmental tests.
- To address the potential for misinterpretation when comparing Griffiths scores directly with other measures.
- To provide a practical solution for accurate score comparison.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the means and standard deviations of the Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GQ and individual scales).
- Comparison of these statistical properties with those of other established developmental tests.
- Development of a corrective formula and accompanying tables for Griffiths scores.
Main Results:
- The GQ and individual scales of the Griffiths Mental Development Scales exhibit unique means and standard deviations.
- These scoring characteristics differ significantly from the common standards used in other developmental tests.
- Direct score comparisons between Griffiths scales and other tests are statistically problematic without adjustment.
Conclusions:
- The distinct statistical properties of the Griffiths scales necessitate careful interpretation.
- A corrective formula and tables are provided to facilitate accurate comparisons of Griffiths scores with other developmental assessments.
- These tools aim to improve the validity of comparative developmental assessments for children aged 2-8 years.