Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer programs for eukaryotic gene prediction.

Vladimir Makarov1

  • 1Bionomix, Inc, Pasadena, CA 91106, USA. vladimir_makarov@hotmail.com

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|July 26, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium phase 1 study of CD40 agonist sotigalimab in pediatric and young adult patients with recurrent CNS tumors and newly-diagnosed DIPG.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Engineering Endogenous T Cell Receptors to Recognize Cancer Neoantigens Using a Hybrid Physics-AI Approach.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A Novel Patient-Derived Xenograft Model of Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

Research square·2026
Same author

Effect of Loading Strategy on Methylene Blue Encapsulation in Ethosomes: A Comparative Study of Aqueous and Ethanol Phases.

Methods and protocols·2026
Same author

Neural cell state modulation by <i>PARK2</i> and dopaminergic neuroprotection by small molecule Parkin agonism.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Genomic modifiers of malignant and neurodevelopmental phenotypes in individuals with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome.

NPJ genomic medicine·2026

This study evaluates seven gene prediction programs for eukaryotes based on accessibility and accuracy. It highlights common computational gene prediction methods and their limitations.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Accurate gene prediction is crucial for understanding eukaryotic genome function.
  • Numerous computational tools exist, but their performance varies significantly.
  • Evaluating these tools is essential for selecting appropriate methods for research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess and compare seven popular gene prediction programs for eukaryotic organisms.
  • To evaluate programs based on their availability for both in-house and online use.
  • To analyze the prediction accuracy of these computational tools.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic evaluation of seven widely used gene prediction software.
  • Assessment of software accessibility: in-house installation versus web-based platforms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Benchmarking prediction accuracy using established datasets and metrics.

    • Main Results:

    • Varied performance observed across the seven evaluated gene prediction programs.
    • Differences in availability (in-house vs. online) impact practical usability.
    • Prediction accuracy is a key differentiator, with some programs outperforming others.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of gene prediction software significantly impacts research outcomes.
    • Understanding tool limitations is vital for reliable eukaryotic gene identification.
    • Further development is needed to improve the accuracy and accessibility of gene prediction tools.