Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

08:30
One-day Workflow Scheme for Bacterial Pathogen Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance Testing from Blood Cultures
Published on: July 9, 2012
Comparison of antibiotic discs from different sources
Journal of Clinical Pathology
|October 1, 1975
Summary
Antibiotic disc manufacturers vary in effectiveness for certain antibiotics, impacting sensitivity testing. Oxoid and Mast discs showed larger inhibition zones for several key antibiotics compared to competitors.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Pharmaceutical Science
Background:
- Accurate antibiotic sensitivity testing is crucial for effective antimicrobial therapy.
- Variations in antibiotic disc content and performance across manufacturers can affect clinical outcomes.
- Standardization of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) components is essential for reliable results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of antibiotic susceptibility testing discs from different manufacturers.
- To identify potential variations in antibiotic content and zone sizes produced by various brands.
- To assess the impact of manufacturer differences on the accuracy of diffusion-sensitivity tests.
Main Methods:
- Diffusion-sensitivity tests were conducted using antibiotic discs from multiple manufacturers (Oxoid, Mast, AB Biodisk, Difco, Baltimore Biological Laboratories).
- Discs with comparable antibiotic content were tested against microbial strains with known sensitivities.
- Zone sizes of bacterial inhibition were measured and compared across different disc sources.
Main Results:
- Oxoid and Mast discs produced significantly larger inhibition zones (1-5 mm) for penicillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, methicillin, carbenicillin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim compared to other brands.
- Discs containing aminoglycosides, lincomycin, fusidic acid, tetracycline, nalidixic acid, high-potency penicillin, and polymyxin B showed consistent zone sizes across manufacturers.
- Intra-manufacturer batch variability for single discs was minimal, but Multodisks sometimes yielded larger zones than single discs from the same source.
Conclusions:
- Manufacturer choice significantly impacts the zone sizes for several commonly used antibiotics in diffusion-sensitivity tests.
- These variations may have implications for the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility results and subsequent treatment decisions.
- Further standardization and quality control are recommended for antibiotic disc manufacturers to ensure consistent performance in clinical laboratories.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antibiotic Selection
Overview
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents depends on various factors influencing their ability to eliminate microbial populations. Larger microbial populations require more time for complete eradication, emphasizing the importance of population size analysis when evaluating antimicrobial efficacy.Microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents varies significantly. Highly resilient microorganisms include endospores, gram-negative bacteria, and non-enveloped viruses, while prions are exceptionally...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...

