Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comprehensive diagnosis: a conceptual basis for future diagnostic systems.

Juan E Mezzich1

  • 1International Center for Mental Health, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10029, USA. juan.mezzich@mssm.edu

Psychopathology
|July 30, 2002
PubMed
Summary

This paper proposes a new way of thinking about diagnosis that goes beyond traditional single-label approaches. It suggests that diagnosis should include multiple health domains, such as illness, disability, and quality of life. The model also incorporates culturally informed clinical problems and patient assets. The authors argue that this integrative approach may provide richer information for clinical care and better support population health surveillance. The framework includes both standardized and personalized elements, emphasizing collaboration between clinicians, patients, and families.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Person-centered care in ophthalmology: current knowledge and perspectives.

Croatian medical journal·2024
Same author

Cultivating Andrija Štampar's legacy: from international health and positive health to person-centered care.

Croatian medical journal·2024
Same author

Psychiatry for the person and its conceptual bases.

International psychiatry : bulletin of the Board of International Affairs of the Royal College of Psychiatrists·2019
Same author

Introduction to Metrics in Person Centered Medicine Research.

International journal of person centered medicine·2017
Same author

A person-centred approach in medicine to reduce the psychosocial and existential burden of chronic and life-threatening medical illness.

International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)·2017
Same author

Background, Structure and Priorities of the 2013 Geneva Declaration on Person-centered Health Research.

International journal of person centered medicine·2015

Area of Science:

  • Clinical diagnostics in mental health
  • Healthcare systems design in medicine

Background:

Current diagnostic systems often focus on isolated conditions, neglecting broader health contexts. Prior research has shown that single-label diagnosis may not fully capture patient complexity. No prior work had resolved how to integrate multiple health domains into diagnostic frameworks. That uncertainty drove the need for a more holistic approach. This gap motivated the exploration of multi-layered diagnostic models. It was already known that mental and physical health are interrelated. However, no prior work had resolved how to systematically combine these aspects. This paper introduces a conceptual shift toward comprehensive diagnosis.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this paper is to propose a conceptual framework for comprehensive diagnosis. It addresses the limitations of single-label diagnosis in capturing patient complexity. The specific problem is the fragmentation of diagnostic systems across health domains. The motivation is to improve clinical descriptions and population health surveillance. The authors seek to integrate multiple diagnostic dimensions into a unified model. This approach is intended to enhance the richness of clinical information. It also aims to support personalized care planning. The paper outlines a model that includes both standardized and idiographic elements.

Keywords:
diagnostic systemsmultiaxial diagnosisclinical formulationhealth surveillance

Frequently Asked Questions

The model integrates standardized multiaxial diagnosis with idiographic personalization, including patient and family perspectives.

It considers multiple illness formulations and contextual factors, moving beyond isolated condition labels.

The authors propose that including quality of life supports a more holistic view of patient health outcomes.

Cultural and contextual factors are emphasized in idiographic formulations to inform personalized care planning.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The authors review existing diagnostic schemas, starting with single-label diagnosis. They then consider multiple illness formulations in mental and general health. Next, they examine clinical condition formulations that include contextualized pathology. They also consider the inclusion of positive health aspects and quality of life. The model integrates standardized multiaxial formulation with idiographic personalization. Cultural and contextual factors are emphasized in the formulation. The authors propose a system that includes both illness and health promotion aspects. The approach is conceptual, not based on empirical data.

Main Results:

The paper identifies limitations in current diagnostic systems, particularly in capturing patient complexity. It proposes a multiaxial model that includes illness, disability, and contextual factors. The model also integrates quality of life and health restoration goals. The authors suggest that this approach may provide richer clinical information. They propose that it could improve surveillance of population health outcomes. The model includes both standardized and personalized components. It emphasizes culturally informed clinical problems and patient assets. The authors suggest that this framework may support more effective care planning.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that comprehensive diagnostic models may enhance clinical descriptions and care planning. They suggest that integrating multiple health domains improves diagnostic richness. The model includes both standardized and idiographic elements. It emphasizes patient and family perspectives in diagnosis. The authors propose that this approach may improve population health surveillance. They suggest that it supports a more holistic view of health outcomes. The model includes both pathology and positive health aspects. The authors conclude that such integrative schemas may offer a more effective focus for clinical care.

By integrating standardized and idiographic elements, it may improve the richness of health data for surveillance.

The authors suggest it may enhance clinical descriptions, care planning, and population health surveillance.