Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Social Scripts

People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter), the opening...

Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Pharmacokinetics, effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol in children and adolescents with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 9+-year results from a multicenter, open-label study.

Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026

Same author

Justice, egocentrism, and resource-rational contractualism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same author

Morality cut both ways: The role of cognition and emotion in attitude moralization and demoralization.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026

Same author

Unmet treatment needs in migraine: Results of the OVERCOME (US) study.

Headache·2026

Same author

Understanding migraine throughout a woman's life and the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide: A narrative review.

Women's health (London, England)·2025

Same author

A Diagnostic Case Study for Manufacturing Gas-Phase Chemical Sensors.

Chemosensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social

Linda J Skitka¹, Elizabeth Mullen¹, Thomas Griffin¹

¹U Illinois.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

|August 2, 2002

Summary

Liberals and conservatives differ in how they explain social problems. Research suggests these differences stem from motivated correction of personal attributions, impacting responses to those needing help.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

Social Psychology
Political Psychology
Cognitive Science

Background:

Liberals and conservatives exhibit distinct attributional styles for social problems.
These differing attributions influence responses to individuals requiring assistance for internal-controllable issues.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the underlying cognitive and motivational factors driving political differences in social problem attribution.
To differentiate between dispositional tendencies, ideological scripts, and motivated correction as explanations.

Main Methods:

Employed diverse methodologies including the 'college bowl' paradigm, attitude-attribution paradigm, and surveys.
Utilized an experiment assessing attributional judgments under varying cognitive load conditions.
Involved nationally representative samples to ensure generalizability.

Main Results:

Findings strongly supported the 'motivated correction' explanation for attributional differences.
Political ideology significantly correlates with the motivation to adjust personal attributions.
Cognitive load influenced attributional judgments, particularly for conservatives.

Conclusions:

Motivated correction of personal attributions is a key mechanism explaining liberal-conservative differences in social problem perception.
Understanding these cognitive strategies and motivational priorities offers insight into political divides.
Future research should explore interventions targeting motivated correction to foster empathy across political ideologies.