Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stroke care: how do we measure quality?

Kieran Walsh1, P H Gompertz, A G Rudd

  • 1Colchester General Hospital, Colchester, Essex SS16 5NL, UK. Kieran@kmwalsh.freeserve.co.uk

Postgraduate Medical Journal
|August 2, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding caregivers' experiences and perspectives on online support: a qualitative study.

Aging & mental health·2026
Same author

Agency and insecurities in (re)making a sense of home amidst later life homelessness: towards a conceptual framing.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

The role of general practitioners in dementia diagnosis: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.

Family practice·2026
Same author

CRISPRi screening in cultured human astrocytes uncovers distal enhancers controlling genes dysregulated in Alzheimer's disease.

Nature neuroscience·2025
Same author

Self-directed learning and clinical decision support.

The Ulster medical journal·2025
Same author

Digital clinical decision support to improve care and to save costs: a pilot survey of the views of frontline healthcare professionals.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2025
Same journal

Dapagliflozin-induced anaphylactic shock.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Comparative efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in severe alopecia areata: a network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Two cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis with severe ocular involvement treated with adjunctive tofacitinib.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Diastolic dysfunction and diabetes: the DIADAD study-a retrospective cohort study from Liverpool.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Care, cash, and proof: forensic accountability for war-related starvation.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Response to traumatic injuries in polo players in England.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
See all related articles

This review explores methods for measuring stroke care quality, highlighting challenges in outcome assessment. Process measures are recommended for understanding and improving stroke care quality.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Measuring the quality of stroke care is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
  • Existing methods face challenges related to case mix and risk adjustment.
  • Understanding both process and outcome measures is essential for effective quality assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and summarize methods for measuring the quality of stroke care.
  • To identify challenges in measuring stroke care outcomes, processes, and structures.
  • To draw conclusions on the most effective ways to measure stroke care quality.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature search was conducted on Medline using keywords such as 'stroke', 'quality', 'outcome of care', 'process of care', and 'structure of care'.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Articles focusing on methods to measure stroke care quality and associated measurement difficulties were selected.
  • Selected articles were reviewed to extract primary outcome measures and summarize methodologies.

    • Main Results:

    • Outcome measures for stroke care quality are subject to practical problems, including case mix consequences and risk adjustment difficulties.
    • Process measures can help clinicians understand variations in outcomes.
    • Linking specific care processes to outcome measures is vital for effective quality monitoring.

    Conclusions:

    • Process measures are valuable tools for understanding and improving stroke care quality.
    • The national sentinel audit for stroke serves as an example of a tool for examining stroke care process quality.
    • A combination of outcome and process measures, with a focus on auditable processes, offers the most robust approach to measuring stroke care quality.