Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Theoretical considerations on the health checkup accuracy of combination testing
1Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan. sshibata@excite.co.jp
Objectives:
To find basic theoretical evidence for an optimum combination of multi-phasic health checkup testing obtained by considering how the health checkup accuracy changes with the number of tests (n) and kinds of combination methods (A, B, C, D and E).
Methods:
To find how the health checkup accuracy changes with the number of tests and type of combination method, generalized formulas as functions of the number of tests, are obtained to calculate the over-all health checkup accuracy which is defined by sensitivity (alpha), specificity (beta) and odds-ratio (gamma), based on the two-by-two table. Five kinds of combination methods were considered: A) Sequential tests. B) Sequential tests after changing the order in A. C) Simultaneous tests using the Believe-the-Negative Rule. D) Simultaneous tests using the Believe-the-Positive Rule. E) Simultaneous tests using the Believe-all-Positive-all-Negative Rule.
Results:
It was proved that combination methods A, B and C are "equivalent" for health checkup accuracy. Therefore, the five methods could be summarized into three patterns. For A, B and C: beta and gamma increased but a decreased with increasing n. For D: alpha increased but beta and gamma decreased with n. For E: alpha, beta and gamma increased with n.
Conclusion:
Health checkup accuracy of combination testing is the best in case of E, although problems exist concerning how to judge the borderline subjects.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Test for Homogeneity