Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation.

Michael S Wogalter1, Vincent C Conzola, Tonya L Smith-Jackson

  • 1Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7801, USA.

Applied Ergonomics
|August 8, 2002
PubMed
Summary

This study reviews decades of research on warning design and evaluation. Effective warning design and evaluation methods can reduce product-related injuries and damage.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Specific egress directives enhance print and speech fire warnings.

Applied ergonomics·2019
Same author

Effects of emphasis terminology in warning instructions on compliance intent and understandability.

Journal of safety research·2015
Same author

Effect of presentation modality in direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug television advertisements.

Applied ergonomics·2014
Same author

Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment.

Applied ergonomics·2013
Same author

On the hazard of quiet vehicles to pedestrians and drivers.

Applied ergonomics·2013
Same author

The use of contextual cues to improve warning symbol comprehension: making the connection for older adults.

Ergonomics·2013

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors
  • Product Safety
  • Risk Communication

Background:

  • Empirical research on warning design and evaluation has significantly advanced over the last 20 years.
  • Established principles now guide warning design (signal words, color, symbols, content) and placement within product instructions.
  • User-centric factors like risk perception and stress influence warning usability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of the empirical literature on warning design and evaluation guidelines.
  • To present methods for evaluating warning effectiveness, including communication and behavioral compliance.
  • To offer practical guidance for researchers, practitioners, and manufacturers.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of empirical research on warning design and evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of established principles and guidelines for warning creation.
  • Description of evaluation methodologies for assessing warning effectiveness.

    • Main Results:

    • A comprehensive set of guidelines for warning design, placement, and usability enhancement.
    • Developed evaluation methods to measure warning communication and behavioral influence.
    • Identification of user-internal factors impacting warning effectiveness.

    Conclusions:

    • Researchers, practitioners, and manufacturers can utilize these guidelines to improve product safety.
    • Effective warning strategies can mitigate risks associated with product hazards.
    • The findings contribute to reducing the incidence of injury and product damage.