Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Alteplase versus urokinase in restoring blood flow in hemodialysis-catheter thrombosis
Heather Eyrich1, Ted Walton, Edwin J Macon
1Department of Pharmacy and Drug Information, Grady Health System, 80 Jessie Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
The effectiveness of alteplase and urokinase in restoring adequate hemodialysis blood-flow rates was examined. A retrospective review of the medical records of hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters receiving alteplase or urokinase for presumed catheter thrombosis between June 1997 and December 2000 was conducted. Patients received 1 mL of alteplase 1 mg/mL or 1 mL of urokinase 5000 units/mL in each catheter port. The choice of the thrombolytic agent was left to the prescriber. Effectiveness of thrombolysis was defined as achieving a posttreatment hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min, maintained for at least 30 minutes during the dialysis session. Inclusion criteria included adherence to the thrombolytic protocol and the inability to achieve a hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min during the first 60 minutes of the hemodialysis session despite at least one attempt to reposition the catheter. Both thrombolytic agents significantly increased the hemodialysis blood-flow rates. Patients with alteplase-treated catheters were twice as likely to achieve hemodialysis blood-flow rates of > 300 mL/min (p = 0.0134) and were more likely to complete hemodialysis during that session (93% versus 70%, p = 0.0234). The percentage of functioning catheters at a subsequent hemodialysis session did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.0806). The majority of patients in both treatment groups required no further interventions. Hemodialysis blood-flow rates increased after either alteplase 1 mg/mL per port or urokinase 5000 units per port was used to clear presumed catheter thrombosis. Alteplase was more likely than urokinase to result in a hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min.
The effectiveness of alteplase and urokinase in restoring adequate hemodialysis blood-flow rates was examined. A retrospective review of the medical records of hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters receiving alteplase or urokinase for presumed catheter thrombosis between June 1997 and December 2000 was conducted. Patients received 1 mL of alteplase 1 mg/mL or 1 mL of urokinase 5000 units/mL in each catheter port. The choice of the thrombolytic agent was left to the prescriber. Effectiveness of thrombolysis was defined as achieving a posttreatment hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min, maintained for at least 30 minutes during the dialysis session. Inclusion criteria included adherence to the thrombolytic protocol and the inability to achieve a hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min during the first 60 minutes of the hemodialysis session despite at least one attempt to reposition the catheter. Both thrombolytic agents significantly increased the hemodialysis blood-flow rates. Patients with alteplase-treated catheters were twice as likely to achieve hemodialysis blood-flow rates of > 300 mL/min (p = 0.0134) and were more likely to complete hemodialysis during that session (93% versus 70%, p = 0.0234). The percentage of functioning catheters at a subsequent hemodialysis session did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.0806). The majority of patients in both treatment groups required no further interventions. Hemodialysis blood-flow rates increased after either alteplase 1 mg/mL per port or urokinase 5000 units per port was used to clear presumed catheter thrombosis. Alteplase was more likely than urokinase to result in a hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications

