Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical errors in surgery.

D Emmott

    Bioethics Forum
    |August 9, 2002
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Medical errors, or adverse effects from treatment, are a significant problem in American healthcare. This article advocates for trusting healthcare providers and peer review to improve safety, rather than a no-fault system.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A comparison of end versus loop stomas for ileal conduit urinary diversion.

    The Journal of urology·1985
    Same journal

    Bioethics and Global Climate Change.

    Bioethics forum·2009
    Same journal

    What should we do?

    Bioethics forum·2005
    Same journal

    Prisoners as vulnerable persons.

    Bioethics forum·2005
    Same journal

    Project BRIDGE--people with disabilities participate in their health care decisions.

    Bioethics forum·2005
    Same journal

    Autonomy and competency--self-determination in the lives of adults with developmental disabilities.

    Bioethics forum·2005
    Same journal

    Treating immigrant populations--cultural competence in health care.

    Bioethics forum·2005
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical error analysis
    • Healthcare quality improvement
    • Professional ethics in medicine

    Background:

    • The Institute of Medicine has highlighted a high incidence of medical errors in American healthcare.
    • Adverse effects resulting from medical treatment represent a critical patient safety concern.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To argue against a no-fault system for addressing medical errors.
    • To advocate for a cultural shift in healthcare prioritizing patient safety.
    • To emphasize the importance of provider motivation and peer review.

    Main Methods:

    • This article presents a critical analysis of current approaches to medical error.
    • It reviews the ethical considerations of healthcare as a profession versus a commodity.
    • It calls for a reevaluation of the healthcare system's cultural underpinnings.
    Keywords:
    Health Care and Public Health

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The study argues that a no-fault system is an inadequate solution for medical errors.
    • It posits that trusting provider motivations and the peer review process can drive necessary change.
    • It highlights the potential for a cultural revolution in healthcare focused on safety.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare should be viewed as an honorable profession, not a mere service.
    • Providers must act as courageous leaders, making patient safety their paramount concern.
    • A cultural transformation, driven by trust and professional integrity, is essential for reducing medical errors.